Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ex-girlfriend of Graham Platner says he removed condoms without consent during sex [View all]hlthe2b
(115,422 posts)44. Maybe, just maybe others are either less informed or actually MORE INFORMED on the issue
as I have repeatedly posted. As my relative has tried to prosecute these cases (and failed) because the few states that have laws are most often civil--even California--and thus not clearly considered rape. Should it be? That is a different question that I'm not arguing. But the reality is (as some of the possibly more informed, and not less caring, less concerned DUers may know) is not prosecuted as sexual assault but rather a civil offense in most states. Those where a law may specifically allow for a serious sexual assualt prosecution rarely succeed as I have laid out direct from one who has tried.
This year, at least three states Vermont, Texas, and Utah are reportedly considering passing anti-stealthing legislation inspired by the California law, though none have made it to its respective governor's desk. Several more states have considered versions of the issue since 2017, though those previous bills have so far failed to gain the traction necessary to push through legislatures in Wisconsin, New York, New Jersey and Idaho, in part because there has been disagreement over whether "stealthing" rises to the level of rape and whether it's a civil or criminal offense. (It should be noted that the bill only passed in California after Garcia re-introduced it as a civil not criminal offense.)
Read More: https://www.women.com/1270289/yes-stealthing-is-sexual-assault-here-are-the-states-taking-action-against-it/
I put my feminism and support for sexual abuse/assault/harassment victims against anyone, but I am also educated on these issues, thanks to my own interest (including outside of medicine) into law from my extended family "legal community"--which is both extensive and diverse in terms of practice. I also do not denigrate other DUers who are not educated on the matter and conflate them (without other evidence to the contrary) as uncaring, misogynists, or anything else. The truth is this issue is complicated and many here may actually know THAT as well. Rape is something most fully appreciate. This is an emerging serious violative issue, but the law on it is not at all consistent, clear, or readily applied.
So, if my statement of the current state of facts is disturbing to you and you wish to call me out or "lose respect" for me. SO be it. I hope that is not the case, but truth is not always what we want to hear or read.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ex-girlfriend of Graham Platner says he removed condoms without consent during sex [View all]
demmiblue
Tuesday
OP
Only if it is a clear violation of a consensual agreement--and then almost always ONLY if repercussions
hlthe2b
Tuesday
#6
It is illegal in my state because it negates a woman's consent and it is treated as sexual assualt.
50 Shades Of Blue
Tuesday
#9
It is hard to prove. I have a close relative who lives in such a state-- and has tried to prosecute...
hlthe2b
Tuesday
#13
And given courts, juries, judges believe the defendent's claim of accident--sans a lot of other
hlthe2b
Tuesday
#16
EdmondDantes. You tell me we exactly where I have ever given him benefit-of-the-doubt?
hlthe2b
Tuesday
#31
The intent (as you WELL know is to put emphasis on the rape allegations already made)
hlthe2b
Tuesday
#54
I fear the party powers-that-be are going to make everything even worse (if that is possible)..
hlthe2b
Tuesday
#40
Oh who cares about this? Are people really interested in these kinds of details?
Nanjeanne
Tuesday
#10
Even those few states that have developed (mostly civil statutes) fail to consider it rape
hlthe2b
Tuesday
#36
In only a few states, no matter how you or I may feel about it. Please stop calling out DUers
hlthe2b
Tuesday
#37
I am downplaying nothing. Only that the emphasis on the rapes is enough to remove him
hlthe2b
Tuesday
#55
You are being ridiculous and your accusations show you don't bother to read or
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#57
I think it should be But those states with or considering stealthing statutes largely have not...
hlthe2b
Tuesday
#35
Maybe, just maybe others are either less informed or actually MORE INFORMED on the issue
hlthe2b
Tuesday
#44
Especially with the downfall of Roe, and the attack on women's reproductive healthcare.n/t
demmiblue
Tuesday
#32
I think many do. But there is a lot of misinformation and conflation on this issue and
hlthe2b
Tuesday
#39
You and I believe so-- along with most women. The law has NOT caught up and we need to
hlthe2b
15 hrs ago
#62