Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ex-girlfriend of Graham Platner says he removed condoms without consent during sex [View all]EdmondDantes_
(2,352 posts)53. Here's the exact quote:
"I find this article gratuitous in every way and smacks of unprovable bad behavior meant to malign and pile-on for any number of motivations."
That's giving him the benefit of the doubt right there. Or did someone else write the post for you?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ex-girlfriend of Graham Platner says he removed condoms without consent during sex [View all]
demmiblue
20 hrs ago
OP
Only if it is a clear violation of a consensual agreement--and then almost always ONLY if repercussions
hlthe2b
20 hrs ago
#6
It is illegal in my state because it negates a woman's consent and it is treated as sexual assualt.
50 Shades Of Blue
20 hrs ago
#9
It is hard to prove. I have a close relative who lives in such a state-- and has tried to prosecute...
hlthe2b
20 hrs ago
#13
And given courts, juries, judges believe the defendent's claim of accident--sans a lot of other
hlthe2b
19 hrs ago
#16
EdmondDantes. You tell me we exactly where I have ever given him benefit-of-the-doubt?
hlthe2b
19 hrs ago
#31
The intent (as you WELL know is to put emphasis on the rape allegations already made)
hlthe2b
15 hrs ago
#54
I fear the party powers-that-be are going to make everything even worse (if that is possible)..
hlthe2b
18 hrs ago
#40
Oh who cares about this? Are people really interested in these kinds of details?
Nanjeanne
20 hrs ago
#10
Even those few states that have developed (mostly civil statutes) fail to consider it rape
hlthe2b
18 hrs ago
#36
In only a few states, no matter how you or I may feel about it. Please stop calling out DUers
hlthe2b
18 hrs ago
#37
I am downplaying nothing. Only that the emphasis on the rapes is enough to remove him
hlthe2b
14 hrs ago
#55
You are being ridiculous and your accusations show you don't bother to read or
hlthe2b
8 hrs ago
#57
I think it should be But those states with or considering stealthing statutes largely have not...
hlthe2b
18 hrs ago
#35
Maybe, just maybe others are either less informed or actually MORE INFORMED on the issue
hlthe2b
18 hrs ago
#44
Especially with the downfall of Roe, and the attack on women's reproductive healthcare.n/t
demmiblue
19 hrs ago
#32
I think many do. But there is a lot of misinformation and conflation on this issue and
hlthe2b
18 hrs ago
#39