Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(107,044 posts)
6. No, it is, surprisingly, the $5 million verdict that explicitly includes the sexual abuse verdict
Thu Jul 9, 2026, 08:56 AM
13 hrs ago
E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump is the name of two related civil lawsuits filed in federal court by American author E. Jean Carroll against United States President Donald Trump. The two suits, both overseen by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, resulted in a total of $88.3 million in damages being awarded to Carroll and are undergoing appeal efforts. The cases were related to Carroll's accusation from mid-2019 (during Trump's first term) that he sexually assaulted her in late 1995 or early 1996. Trump denied the allegations, prompting Carroll to sue him for defamation in November 2019 (a.k.a. Carroll I).

In November 2022, Carroll filed her second suit against Trump (a.k.a. Carroll II), renewing her claim of defamation and adding a claim of battery[a] under the Adult Survivors Act, a New York law allowing sexual-assault victims to file civil suits beyond expired statutes of limitations. The suit went to trial in April 2023. Evidence included testimony from two friends Carroll spoke to after the alleged incident, a photograph of Carroll with Trump in 1987, testimony from two women who had separately accused Trump of sexual assault, footage from the Trump Access Hollywood tape and his October 2022 deposition. In reaching the verdict, the judge asked the jury to find if the preponderance of the evidence suggested that Trump raped Carroll under New York's narrow legal definition of rape at that time, denoting forcible penile penetration. The jury instead found him liable for a lesser degree of sexual abuse, as well as defamation, and ordered him to pay US$5 million in damages. Trump unsuccessfully made a counterclaim and appealed to the Second Circuit. Trump then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which declined to hear the case in June 2026.

In September 2023, Kaplan issued a partial summary judgment regarding Carroll I, finding Trump liable for defamation via his 2019 statements. The jury verdict from the January 2024 trial was $83.3 million in additional damages. Trump secured a bond for this amount plus 10% to appeal. The Second Circuit rejected his effort in April 2026. Trump's team indicated that it would ask the Supreme Court to use the Westfall Act to swap the Department of Justice in as defendant, which would moot the case as the federal government cannot be sued for defamation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump

You might think that the one with the finding of sexual abuse would carry the higher damages, but that's the justice system for you.

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not if you're the president. spanone 13 hrs ago #1
Correct me if I'm wrong, House of Roberts 13 hrs ago #2
No, it is, surprisingly, the $5 million verdict that explicitly includes the sexual abuse verdict muriel_volestrangler 13 hrs ago #6
OK, generally I don't delve into details House of Roberts 12 hrs ago #11
Be sure to downplay trump's allegations of exploiting kids, NYT.... Blue Owl 13 hrs ago #3
Iokiyar Blues Heron 13 hrs ago #4
That's essentially what the article says. maxsolomon 9 hrs ago #21
My knife is out for the NYT because of the way it admires what the Republicans do muriel_volestrangler 9 hrs ago #23
The Republicon male candidates know blubunyip 13 hrs ago #5
Being a molester, rapist, pedo is a badge of honor for the r's. R women absolutely love their men that way. erronis 11 hrs ago #12
Sad headline, but accurate. harumph 13 hrs ago #7
Read the excerpt. These are not self-aware journalists. They're excuse-making scum (nt) muriel_volestrangler 13 hrs ago #8
Thank you MV, I will. harumph 13 hrs ago #9
Cost talent. Wow. From a certain point of view. But man it is an ugly world they bolster. lostnfound 12 hrs ago #10
If he did it once, and admits to it ... FakeNoose 11 hrs ago #13
This message was self-deleted by its author littlemissmartypants 11 hrs ago #16
That's probably how a lot of low info low involvement people see it as well. BannonsLiver 11 hrs ago #14
Fetterman Was Considered Talent modrepub 11 hrs ago #15
Only for Democrats Zelda_Orchid 11 hrs ago #17
But voters will reward the party for that down the road. BannonsLiver 11 hrs ago #18
Regarding who might take Platner's place... GiqueCee 10 hrs ago #19
We elected a fucking serial rapist as the president of the United States, dipshits! Initech 10 hrs ago #20
They know that. They just can't publish that. maxsolomon 9 hrs ago #22
I know, it's so damn infuriating. Initech 9 hrs ago #25
In the end, Death. maxsolomon 9 hrs ago #26
I don't have time to read, but the GOP kicked out Tony Gonzales at the same time, we kicked out Swalwell LeftInTX 9 hrs ago #24
sexually assaulting someone means they can not take no for an answer rampartd 9 hrs ago #27
It was the right choice nerdytrey825 9 hrs ago #28
Let the GOP be the hypocrites. surfered 8 hrs ago #31
Written from a perspective every bit as amoral (at best) as the republican party's unblock 8 hrs ago #29
I am glad that they made it clear that Rs are the ones ignoring these allegations senseandsensibility 8 hrs ago #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Actual NYT headline: "Doe...»Reply #6