General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm all for a total ban on semi-automatic guns [View all]krispos42
(49,445 posts)I don't agree with you, but I appreciate the consistent manner in which you approach the issue.
"Assault weapons" are semi-automatic guns with too many secondary features. It's a failed attempt to differentiate between "good" and "bad" semiautomatic guns, the apparent thinking being too many secondary features make the gun "bad.
I wrote a post on this if you're interested: http://www.democraticunderground.com/117295365
You would have to compensate people if you take their guns; fair market price for them. That would probably average $1,000 per gun. Maybe more. It would be a sizeable chunk of change, hundred of billions of dollars.
Honestly, I don't think it would reduce either gun crime or overall crime. 95% of murders are single-victim incidents, most murders are done with handguns, a large chunk of murders are because of gang activities, etc. But your approach is logical and does not have ambiguities and exceptions that are hallmark weaknesses of the old expired and new proposed AWB.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):