General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Some of here sometimes feel Unwelcome. Even many of us who were here back..Way Back [View all]graham4anything
(11,464 posts)JUST because Bush wasn't liked, it didn't mean the democratic party is liked.
It is a common mistake to think the Bush's meant Kerry and Obama/and/or Hillary and Bill were wanted.
THat just meant they were Ron Paul fans then(as most of the Obama haters and Hillary/Bill haters on CGCS were.
I fell for the hate Bush means Democratic so back anything the hate Bush team did.
It was a bad mistake. And almost all turned out to be Ron Paul aka Libertarian aka Nader
aka Jill Stein psynchopants and ANYTHING BUT democratic party.
Those Hating anyhting President Obama has done since 2009 (prior to inuauguration) and anything the Clinton's did, means NOT A DEMOCRATIC person (even IF they voted for one to get the Bush's out.
THAT is the problem with anti-voters in general.
I voted FOR President Obama in 2008 and 2012 by choice, I picked him back in 2004, but 2004 was too early, though my button I have said 2004.
I voted FOR Bill and will eagerly vote FOR Hillary
I don't vote AGAINST I vote FOR.
and the democratic party fracture led to ALL loses since Adlai Stevenson lost
We could have had 80 plus years if we kept the infighting out of the public eye and just
in years one didn't like a wedge issue
One put the nose plugs on and vote straight democratic
I for one find it very greedy of individuals who put their one and only wedge issues in front of the collective good
95% of the democratic party supports Barack Obama and will support the 2016 nominee especially if it is Hillary who can and will win.
The other 5 have shown they would rather lose and nothing will make them happy