General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Some of here sometimes feel Unwelcome. Even many of us who were here back..Way Back [View all]graham4anything
(11,464 posts)so it is a faux question
also faux is the collateral question
Those same people plus could be up to millions more would have died w/o drones by the bad people in those countries who on a daily basis kill and wound.
Example-I would have welcomed a drone on Hitler if it saved 20 million lives including the 6 million of my ancestors and relatives in the process
If 10 other people died next to Hitler, they would have died anyhow, and if they too were Nazi's, well, they would have been executed had they lived to the end of the world.
If the 10 were Jews, the would have died in the gas chambers.
So one drone could have saved 20 million or more lives.
Which would you advise?
Why is it the same people who go on about drones don't want guns/bullets banned which harm more?
Odd?
What reason are people defending guns?
I don't get it?
And would we get rid of drones and have ground war that kills millions on all sides?