General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Are the Feminist / MRA Argument Threads a means to "Divide and Conquer" DU - POLL [View all]Shandris
(3,447 posts)...as your post seemed to insinuate that I was calling for no discussion of women's issues on the entire 'board' (IE, all of DU). If you were meaning 'board' as the sub-boards of DU (GD, Pol2013, Lounge, etc) then I apologize for responding too hastily.
However, I would like to clarify one thing: I don't see 'Feminism/MRA' and 'womens issues' as the same thing. There are certain topics that are guaranteed Feminism/MRA gruel, and then there are issues that affect women. I concur that the F/MRA gruel should be discussed elsewhere. Without taking any side in which is right and which isn't and who is at fault and who isn't (with the exception of posts I've made earlier, like the one you brought to my attention in another thread where I specifically noted how terrible of a post it was that you had quoted), I'd like to -not- see that back and forth occupying the front of the main GD board. There isn't going to be a winner, nor is anyone going to convince anyone passionately on either side of the 'wrongness' of their beliefs. It isn't a discussion and only serves to present a fractured face to anyone who is casually perusing our board.
Now, women's issues, otoh, are entirely germane to the GD board imo and I wouldn't see those 'banished' anywhere, just as I wouldn't see trans issues, lgbt issues, civil rights, or anything else of interest to all liberals removed.
I hope that helps to clarify what I mean, and why.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):