General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Are the Feminist / MRA Argument Threads a means to "Divide and Conquer" DU - POLL [View all]Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)I know the NRA is, and given the animosity that outfit draws, I assumed MRA was a key-stroke problem, and that this was another curious tumor in the vast NRA cancer.
But formal or not, it seems to serve a similar function in the "shame culture" that permeates DU: Prop up a tag, pile on the straw, and let the sparks fly. Most folks here were content with assigning "gun" threads to the two (2) groups set up to in some way accommodate them, reasons being the divisiveness the issue caused, and because of the willingness of pro-2A folks to go with the now-current TOS. The control/ban folks most did not want the return to "no guns."
It appears that there may be fear within the feminist groups (and Castle Bansalot, for that matter) that the issues will be relegated to an echo-chamber, and GD is needed to nurture and keep issues alive. There is validity in feminist issues and in male concerns, both. The problem appears to be in the mean-spirited, blame-assigning, and my-way-highway approach that not only turns folks off to GD, but materially blocks any give & take on issues involving sexual orientation.