General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Are the Feminist / MRA Argument Threads a means to "Divide and Conquer" DU - POLL [View all]stevenleser
(32,886 posts)And complaints and alerts are more often than not completely ignored. Here is the point.
By and large, DUers are extremely receptive to the points that both of the more modern waves of feminists agree on. And their receptiveness goes up even more if the issues are presented in a way that is positive and non-accusatory. In particular:
1. I think it is counterproductive for any feminist here to focus the attention on issues that 2nd and 3rd wavers disagree about. Knowing that disagreement exists and then feigning surprise when any OP that does this gets contentious is disingenuous IMHO.
2. Posting an OP that solicits ideas for how to identify DUers that might be MRAs is also what I would call counterproductive. Frankly, I don't see any talking points on DU that resemble what I saw when I researched what MRAs are all about. And this bizarre obsession some seem to have to insult fellow DUers by calling them MRAs is not exactly how to win friends and influence people.
3. While we are at it, characterizing people who defend kinds of porn on 1st amendment grounds as consumers of that kind of porn is also pretty counterproductive and IMHO should result in a tombstone.
Are those tone issues? Well, some of them are considerably beyond that, but they all involve folks who clearly are out to cause fights, not further equality.