Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
4. Yes, if only to rein him in
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 12:14 PM
Feb 2015

Two things are important to remember here:

1) Obama, to his credit, is asking for an AUMF (as jwirr points out). But,

2) We've been fighting ISIS for 6 months without an AUMF. And Obama has made it clear that, while he considers it Congress' job to authorize military force, he's prepared to pursue this war with or without Congress, stretching the 2001 AUMF beyond any original intention.

Obama's message to Congress has been: I'm doing this; it sure would be nice if you said okay, but I'm doing it regardless. Congress needs to step up, not because our president needs them but because we need them to rein in the imperial presidency regardless of who is living in the White House.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should Congress authorize...»Reply #4