Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sancho

(9,172 posts)
10. I suspect that the vast majority of material is no public now...
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 12:26 PM
Mar 2015

I'm sure you are aware that since Nixon, there have obviously been systems to record audio and video everything. I assume that occurs in the WH now.

With new technology, should the public be able to monitor virtually everything top employees do?

Should I be able to see every appointment my Senator has...so I know who he is talking to...or emailing or texting or calling?

If something is secret, then declare it a secure meeting or document. Otherwise, why not be able to see trade negotiations, lobbyist presentations, and text messages?

I just think that email is such a small part of the story. You seem to be on the side of full disclosure. I'm not sure everyone will go that way, but that seems inevitable to me.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Which of the following sh...»Reply #10