Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)

8. that is powerful

Reply to hollysmom (Reply #1)

Fri Sep 18, 2015, 12:14 PM

Sep 2015

it forces them to take responsibility for their policies that harm the poor

although in terms of food stamps, the right wing doesn't care about anyone who has been born.

I recently read a quote from a Catholic activist who said that the RW are not pro-life, they are pro-birth,

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

You "right to lifers" out there answer this question [View all] Stargazer99 Sep 2015 OP

rather than use thiat argument, I prefer hollysmom Sep 2015 #1

That's a good comeback... Phentex Sep 2015 #4

that is powerful virtualobserver Sep 2015 #8

Do you have come context for this post, please? MineralMan Sep 2015 #2

Major break in Baby Doe case; Neighbors describe missing girl next door mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2015 #6

Thanks! MineralMan Sep 2015 #12

You must have looked away from the Internet for ten seconds. mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2015 #13

I live in Boston and have been hearing about this on the news all day. smirkymonkey Sep 2015 #3

I would remove "can't take care of" as that usually jwirr Sep 2015 #5

It's not always about economics, but about determining beforehand whether you have smirkymonkey Sep 2015 #11

That is a good point. One of my grandsons is a gamer jwirr Sep 2015 #14

The question to ask them is why did God let the kid die? YabaDabaNoDinoNo Sep 2015 #7

Could be both. Just not "All-Beneficent." WinkyDink Sep 2015 #10

What is the question? WinkyDink Sep 2015 #9

This is a shitty argument. Brickbat Sep 2015 #15