Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ShazzieB

(19,063 posts)
14. I suspect he welcomes this.
Wed Sep 4, 2024, 05:10 PM
Sep 2024

First, if Cannon was going to get mad at Smith, she's probably already mad at him for appealing this decision, as well as her earlier ones. I don't see this filing from CREW as likely to make much difference either way.

Second, this brief was filed by an outside group. There's no indication that Smith was involved in any way. It would therefore be extremely childish to hold this against him. Very few people would be that childishly petty, so the risk seems pretty low to me.

Third, if this effort from CREW is successful and the 11th circuit, which is probably already tired of her shenanigans (cannonigans? ) takes her off the case, it won't matter what she thinks.

Personally, I think the possible benefits of this outweigh what I feel is a relatively small risk.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sounds good, but do they have standing to even make that request? groundloop Sep 2024 #1
Yes. They can file an amicus curiae brief with the court's permission. Ocelot II Sep 2024 #2
Excellent. I hope it does some good. groundloop Sep 2024 #3
It is a fund raising motion. former9thward Sep 2024 #12
See reply 4 nt. Pluvious Sep 2024 #16
Not sure the relevance of that reply. former9thward Sep 2024 #17
Thanks for info. riversedge Sep 2024 #7
This group is responsible for Cowboys for Trump Couy Griffin duhneece Sep 2024 #4
Thank you for posting. Sharp people work at CREW. Let's see what happens. C0RI0LANUS Sep 2024 #5
Two questions: Were these filed electronically as shown? Are red footnote numbers (links) really allowed? Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2024 #6
Not sure but that is what CREW had linked at their website BumRushDaShow Sep 2024 #8
Thank you. Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2024 #9
Seems our Federal justice system is in a little disarray, from the Supreme Court to the republianmushroom Sep 2024 #10
I'm betting that Jack Smith is wishing they hadn't done that..... lastlib Sep 2024 #11
I wonder what more she could do MadameButterfly Sep 2024 #13
I suspect he welcomes this. ShazzieB Sep 2024 #14
"Childish"? She's a MAGAt.... lastlib Sep 2024 #15
My prediction: the 11th Circuit denies the CREW's motion for leave to file its amicus brief. onenote Sep 2024 #18
I've been scolded here many times for suggesting that Cannon is slow-walking it Orrex Sep 2024 #19
Not scolding them. Just predicting what I think will happen. onenote Sep 2024 #20
You're not a scold. Orrex Sep 2024 #21
Fire Cannons ignorant biased ass !!!!! I hate her guts. Trueblue1968 Sep 2024 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Watchdog seeks Cannon rem...»Reply #14