Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(44,907 posts)
18. My prediction: the 11th Circuit denies the CREW's motion for leave to file its amicus brief.
Wed Sep 4, 2024, 09:41 PM
Sep 2024

Under the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, an amicus curiae may file its brief only by leave of court or if the brief states that all parties have consented to its filing. The CREW Brief does not indicate that either the government or the defense have consented to its filings. Where that is the case, the 11th Circuit has a track record of denying the requested leave to file. The most recent data I could find indicated that motions for leave to file where the parties haven't consented is denied more than half the time. In this instance, when the petition addresses an issue not raised by the government in its brief and seeks an action not sought by the government, it seems pretty likely that the 11th Circuit isn't going to accept the brief. Again, just a prediction on my part, but one that is consistent with the 11th Circuit's previous decision rejecting petitions filed seeking Cannon's disqualification.

See https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=18949244

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sounds good, but do they have standing to even make that request? groundloop Sep 2024 #1
Yes. They can file an amicus curiae brief with the court's permission. Ocelot II Sep 2024 #2
Excellent. I hope it does some good. groundloop Sep 2024 #3
It is a fund raising motion. former9thward Sep 2024 #12
See reply 4 nt. Pluvious Sep 2024 #16
Not sure the relevance of that reply. former9thward Sep 2024 #17
Thanks for info. riversedge Sep 2024 #7
This group is responsible for Cowboys for Trump Couy Griffin duhneece Sep 2024 #4
Thank you for posting. Sharp people work at CREW. Let's see what happens. C0RI0LANUS Sep 2024 #5
Two questions: Were these filed electronically as shown? Are red footnote numbers (links) really allowed? Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2024 #6
Not sure but that is what CREW had linked at their website BumRushDaShow Sep 2024 #8
Thank you. Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2024 #9
Seems our Federal justice system is in a little disarray, from the Supreme Court to the republianmushroom Sep 2024 #10
I'm betting that Jack Smith is wishing they hadn't done that..... lastlib Sep 2024 #11
I wonder what more she could do MadameButterfly Sep 2024 #13
I suspect he welcomes this. ShazzieB Sep 2024 #14
"Childish"? She's a MAGAt.... lastlib Sep 2024 #15
My prediction: the 11th Circuit denies the CREW's motion for leave to file its amicus brief. onenote Sep 2024 #18
I've been scolded here many times for suggesting that Cannon is slow-walking it Orrex Sep 2024 #19
Not scolding them. Just predicting what I think will happen. onenote Sep 2024 #20
You're not a scold. Orrex Sep 2024 #21
Fire Cannons ignorant biased ass !!!!! I hate her guts. Trueblue1968 Sep 2024 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Watchdog seeks Cannon rem...»Reply #18