Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 92 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Eric Adams's Idiot Lawyer...»Reply #1
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

In reply to the discussion: Eric Adams's Idiot Lawyer Just Undermined His Own Defense [View all]

3Hotdogs

(13,535 posts)
1. Unless I am not understanding, Adam's lawyer is using a Supreme Court recent ruling to argue that Adam's
Reply to erronis (Original post)
Tue Oct 1, 2024, 06:35 AM
Oct 1

actions are now permitted. How does this undermine the defense?


Misleading headline?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

femmedemTalithaAttilatheblond
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Eric Adams's Idiot Lawyer Just Undermined His Own Defense [View all] erronis Oct 1 OP
Unless I am not understanding, Adam's lawyer is using a Supreme Court recent ruling to argue that Adam's 3Hotdogs Oct 1 #1
Article does not support its headline. Does not address that Adams may have no choice but to admit the gifts. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 1 #2
The "Have My Cake and Eat It, Too" defense? TommyT139 Oct 1 #3
If he'd have only called it a Tip for a job well done, he'd be ok... Probatim Oct 1 #4
Grasping at every straw he can. paleotn Oct 1 #5
So bribes aren't illegal if the politician accepts them either before taking action or after taking action. Gotcha. Ramsey Barner Oct 1 #6
Yup onetexan Oct 1 #7
Assuming, arguendo, that the allegations against my client are true they do not constitute bribery. Marcuse Oct 1 #8
That damn Supreme Court! Snyder v. United States Grins Oct 1 #9
We can thank Cadet Bone Spurs for Snyder v. United States red dog 1 Oct 1 #10
We need the Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal and Transparency Act (SCERTA) red dog 1 Oct 1 #11
After an alert and discussion with the hosts, locking. Emile Oct 1 #12
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Eric Adams's Idiot Lawyer...»Reply #1
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2024 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.