Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Think. Again.

(20,942 posts)

1. Is this considered trump's response to Smith's recent filing?

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Fri Oct 4, 2024, 03:36 AM

Oct 2024

If so, It seems obvious the trump legal team is down to just grasping at straws since there is no question trump's actions were indeed an 'attempt to impair “the availability or integrity" of documents or other records related to an official proceeding' because votes are obviously "documents or other records".

But I guess they're just applying the delay tactic again.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Dixc BlueMTexpat Blue Dotty dexdah ArkansasDemocrat1 republianmushroom

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump moves to toss Jan. 6 obstruction charges, citing Supreme Court ruling [View all] BumRushDaShow Oct 2024 OP

Is this considered trump's response to Smith's recent filing? Think. Again. Oct 2024 #1

This Was A "Lawyers for Trump" Filing n/t DallasNE Oct 2024 #2

Wait, are "Lawyers for trump" different than "trump's Lawyers"? Think. Again. Oct 2024 #3

I Confused "Save America Leadership PAC" DallasNE Oct 2024 #4