Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Colorado judge who sentenced election denier Tina Peters to prison receives threats [View all]
DENVERPOPS
(10,758 posts)57. I sure hope
it is Double OO magnums, and you considered chopping off the barrel to like 16" or whatever is barely legal.......
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Colorado judge who sentenced election denier Tina Peters to prison receives threats [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Oct 2024
OP
She's been the head of the civil rights division of the doj since 2021. What's the hold up?
Autumn
Oct 2024
#12
Threats will continue until they prosecute, convict, incarcerate, fine PROMPTLY
bucolic_frolic
Oct 2024
#5
I disagree that "nothing ever happens." D.U. has a small but steady stream of posts about people prosecuted for
3Hotdogs
Oct 2024
#6
Yes but they only have so many resources and many of these should be handled by the state.
Bev54
Oct 2024
#27
SCotUS? Flash: tRump is NOT president. Anyway, incitement to violence is never an official act. . . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2024
#35
He is still the head of the snake and if incitement is not an official act, please tell SCOTUS.
Bev54
Oct 2024
#36
You won't be able to show me where in the SCotUS decision it okays inciting violence
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2024
#37
I am not overreacting in sense of the word and certainly did not make SCOTUS explicitly my point.
Bev54
Oct 2024
#39
I can't read your mind to know. I can only read what you actually post
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2024
#41
I read what you wrote. If you are the first to highlight SCotUS, then it is your point
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2024
#44
Go bother someone else, I have zero interest in your opinion of my comment, nor your judgement.
Bev54
Oct 2024
#45
The overlying problem has existed for years. The problem is local bodys (local governments) CAN NOT stop or control.....
usaf-vet
Oct 2024
#13
To complicated WAS exactly what I wanted to point out. Individuals CAN'T fix this level of complexity. Only goverments!
usaf-vet
Oct 2024
#29
The interwebs have always been lawless. Regulations have always been patchwork.
jaxexpat
Oct 2024
#30
I only know of one politician with the foresight to anticipate this phenomenon.... my one guy would be Paul Wellstone.
usaf-vet
Oct 2024
#33
Thanks for the reminder. I'd forgotten. The PTB had their way with him for that.
jaxexpat
Oct 2024
#34
The 2000 election was a revelation of western civilization's fragility and ultimate collapse.
jaxexpat
Oct 2024
#48
The flying MAGA monkeys are always ready.Bidenomics must've given them a lot of disposable income to play with
Walleye
Oct 2024
#3
Prosecuting the threat mongers? Wapo did a story on just this topic the other day...
paleotn
Oct 2024
#16
"as a practical matter, our government may need to step outside the letter of law"
BumRushDaShow
Oct 2024
#22
I'd be more surprised if there WEREN'T threats from the MAGA terrorists
LymphocyteLover
Oct 2024
#19
I'm not worried that there will be a bloodbath. They don't have enough loonies with guns to take over.
flying_wahini
Oct 2024
#28