Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(143,997 posts)

7. Bruen (like the nonsense that Roberts did with "broad Presidential immunity" )

Reply to J_William_Ryan (Reply #5)

Wed Oct 16, 2024, 04:25 AM

Oct 16

has been an unmitigated disaster when it comes to applying Constitutional intent. These were like knee-jerk, extreme partisan decisions with little or no thought about the impact in the long term.

Ironically, Roberts has displayed surprise at the results and has made halting attempts in subsequent-related rulings, to walk BOTH pieces of crap decsisions back.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court tosses out decision letting 18-year-olds carry guns during emergencies in Pennsylvania [View all] BumRushDaShow Oct 15 OP

"A strong basis in history"? Walleye Oct 15 #1

The Disconnect... GB_RN Oct 15 #2

And most of their written opinions are rationalizations for decisions they wanted to make anyway Walleye Oct 15 #3

Skimpy article. Who was the plaintiff?? Grins Oct 15 #4

There was a link in AP's article to their earlier article on the appeals decision (that is now overturned) BumRushDaShow Oct 16 #6

"...a law intended to protect victims of domestic violence." J_William_Ryan Oct 16 #5

Bruen (like the nonsense that Roberts did with "broad Presidential immunity" ) BumRushDaShow Oct 16 #7