Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

EX500rider

(11,606 posts)

7. Another view of the landing from the other side

Reply to EX500rider (Original post)

Sun Dec 29, 2024, 01:05 PM

Sunday

Link to tweet

Looks to me like they concentrated too hard on making it smooth & eat up too much runway in the process, they set her down with around 4,000ft left (according to some calculations done over at Airliners.net), less then 1/2 when they needed it all at that speed.

Also a gear up/flaps up landing may have faired better on the grass when it comes to slowing the plane down,

Other speculations include past examples of poor CRM (Crew Resource Management) in past Korean pilot accidents due to cultural authority issues.

See:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asiana_Airlines_Flight_214

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_Air_Flight_801

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

EX500rider

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

179 dead in South Korea's worst plane crash in years [View all] EX500rider Sunday OP

Maybe South Korea need to have Falconers to work the Airports Oneear Sunday #1

Video of the /landing/crash: EX500rider Sunday #2

Mayday went out 4 minutes before the crash. LudwigPastorius Sunday #13

Looks like flaps are down in the bird strike/compressor stall vid EX500rider Sunday #14

Yeah I suspect there may have been some tunnel vision over engine restart... EX500rider Sunday #15

DEAR GOD!..Didn't they have time to foam the runway?..I guess probably not. chouchou Sunday #3

This message was self-deleted by its author bamagal62 Sunday #10

In this case foaming the runway would have extended the slide, not helpful in this case IMO EX500rider Sunday #11

Tragic. bamagal62 Sunday #12

The left vid here seems to capture the bird strike in the right engine: EX500rider Sunday #4

Some speculation that the gear up was a oversight: EX500rider Sunday #5

The video of the crash is horrific. Jacson6 Sunday #6

Another view of the landing from the other side EX500rider Sunday #7

If it's Boeing . . . Richard D Sunday #8

737-800 has a generally strong safety record, largely due to mature technology. EX500rider Sunday #9

I'm thinking electrical problem jmowreader Sunday #16

That would require no engines, no APU and bad backup batteries? EX500rider Sunday #18

737 pilot gave a synopsis: EX500rider Sunday #17

It's pretty much a given more people would have survived had the berm not been there Major Nikon Sunday #19

While i agree... EX500rider Monday #20

The antennas almost certainly were mounted on frangible supports Major Nikon Monday #21

Yeah but they were already on approach.. EX500rider Monday #22

They were able to climb which means at least one of the engines was making power at least initially Major Nikon Tuesday #23

I understand them wanting to keep the hull clean to extend glide... EX500rider Tuesday #25

From the time of the mayday call to crash was only 2-3 mins Major Nikon Thursday #27

Well I'd say as soon as possible would have been before the go around.. EX500rider Thursday #28

Crazy year for air crashes RazorbackExpat Tuesday #24

Very sad Demovictory9 Tuesday #26