Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Social Security Update: Republican Says Cuts Should Be 'On the Table' [View all]GiqueCee
(2,377 posts)... were enforced with Fear-of-God righteousness, and politicians were to face real consequences for "borrowing" from it with no intention of ever repaying the the money, there would be no insolvency issue. The Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 specifically forbids the inclusion of SS monies in General Budget calculations. Social Security is a closed system, and would be secure if Republicans kept their filthy hands out of the cookie jar. And the fact that there is any cap on withholding – it's $160,000 at the moment, I believe –is an obscenity. But Republican thievery is dismissed in much the same manner as, "Oh, that's just Trump being Trump", as if that bullshit phrase excuses anything. It does not.
Republicans have wanted to abolish Social Security since the day it was enacted, because they are fundamentally dishonest, greedy people, or they wouldn't be Republicans. Funny, they don't seem to have a problem with supremely profitable oil companies receiving billions in government subsidies every fucking year. Go figure.
Edit history
Recommendations
8 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):