Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

SWBTATTReg

(24,730 posts)

3. Yes, I know that protecting the kids is a top priority, but as to censorship, freedom, etc. to impact these long-

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Sat Jan 11, 2025, 06:26 PM

Jan 11

cherished rights negatively?

I guess I'm going to go back to the long-asked question, where are the parents in all of this? Should they be the ones stopping their children (if they want too) in accessing this material?

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

mike_c

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

More than a dozen states have passed new laws that led to restrictions on pornography. Now the Supreme Court will weigh [View all] BumRushDaShow Jan 11 OP

When one votes for the party of christofascists this is what you get. kimbutgar Jan 11 #1

The vote in Florida was 56 percent Trump, 43 percent Harris. mahatmakanejeeves Jan 11 #2

It's not just in those states Bob_in_VA Jan 11 #5

Yes, I know that protecting the kids is a top priority, but as to censorship, freedom, etc. to impact these long- SWBTATTReg Jan 11 #3

LOL. I'm sure we're all on the edge of our seats for this! PSPS Jan 11 #4

This is going to bring back J-9 Jan 11 #6