Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

moniss

(6,436 posts)
10. I agree on the reporting and
Sun Jan 12, 2025, 06:34 PM
Jan 12

I try to go to various sites within the countries in question and the also see if I can track reporting through AFP, Reuters etc. If I'm looking for general news about things like development projects, government appointments etc. then something like that is usually more straightforward for determining reliability. What I also find is that some of the news sites will carry historical pieces or opinion pieces about things in Africa and across into areas of Asia etc. that may give a view on a specific aspect to something that I had not thought about. I find value in this because it adds to my thinking on subjects and leads me to further research etc. to try and better inform myself.

Even the BBC can be skimpy on reporting about things in general or about conflicts. I think Reuters and AFP have been doing the most of anybody. But there is a strong segment of small sites and journalists trying to report on the conflicts but it is incredibly dangerous for them and many have died. There is also the issue of bias in reporting but I try to filter out the inflammatory words etc. because it does not serve to the "Who, What and Where" that I'm looking for. That's why when I read some initial reporting on Syrian Observer I didn't source it and comment because it was clear they were reporting a report of reports. Once I saw some corroboration in The Times of Israel that at least a certain incident had taken place, despite the details between the two reporting sites, I felt comfortable enough to include them both as source material.

I agree that finding good faith actors is not easy. I have said, and reiterated many times that the average person in the Middle East has been lied to, manipulated and screwed around for over 100 years by powers within their own ranks and by powers at large around the world. The last thing a Palestinian should believe is when a Western government says they are looking out for the interests of the people. The governments in the Middle East and around the world look out for their own interests and it has little to nothing to do with the general welfare of the average person. Power and control. The name of their game.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There has also been recent reporting moniss Jan 12 #1
There is no reporting, or even mention of troop incursions into southern Syria, Beastly Boy Jan 12 #3
There is reporting but not in publications you read. I'm waiting to see if the AFP or Reuters will pick up on it but in moniss Jan 12 #5
I didn't intend to single out Western media in my criticism, Beastly Boy Jan 12 #12
I don't, as I said, reserve criticism for just a few. nt moniss Jan 12 #13
However, you only itemize criticism of Israel, in rather meticulous detail, to the exclusion of the many. Beastly Boy Jan 12 #15
I have been civil and patient over many, many exchanges moniss Jan 12 #18
No, Mr Moniss, I m not painting you as antisemitic! Beastly Boy Jan 12 #20
"or simply you move the goal posts or imply personal aspersions" endgenocide Jan 13 #22
No, I imply goal posts and move personal aspersions. Beastly Boy Jan 13 #27
There is very little reporting about the middle east in general endgenocide Jan 12 #8
I agree on the reporting and moniss Jan 12 #10
There is plenty of mostly negative reporting on Israel. Beastly Boy Jan 12 #11
I can't think of any other country endgenocide Jan 12 #14
Of course you can't. That is the whole point. Beastly Boy Jan 12 #16
Syria isn't the largest recipient of foreign endgenocide Jan 12 #17
I rest my case: only the largest reecepient of US aid comes to your mind. Beastly Boy Jan 12 #19
Ukraines aid is temorary, Israel has been the largest recipent of US endgenocide Jan 13 #21
Like I said, and I don't know why you need this repeated to you again, Beastly Boy Jan 13 #23
I don't need anything repeated and I have stopped reading your posts endgenocide Jan 13 #24
Obviously you do. You just dont want to hear it. But it's not what you want to hear, it's what I want to repeat to you. Beastly Boy Jan 13 #25
Thank-you, the one-sided bias of some is so obvious. The fact that many of the "Israel is always wrong" posts, JohnSJ Jan 13 #26
Most sources cite different numbers. Igel Jan 12 #6
It's possible. nt moniss Jan 12 #9
Welp, bottom line is MarineCombatEngineer Jan 12 #2
Hezbolla has resources worth tens of billions of dollars. Beastly Boy Jan 12 #4
And according to the UN, a large segment of Lebanon's medical infrastructure was purposely devastated. C0RI0LANUS Jan 12 #7
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Lebanese whose homes were...»Reply #10