Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

moniss

(6,436 posts)
16. So the "excuse" used to not release part 2 now is that
Mon Jan 13, 2025, 04:14 PM
Jan 13

criminal charges are still being pursued against the two underlings. Everybody knows those will be dropped immediately when Donald Crumb takes office. So why not file now to withdraw the charges, since we all know they are going nowhere, and release the report? Garland can do this in 2 short documents. I actually doubt that the Smith Report Part 2 is going to have details about what is in the classified documents found because none of that info is necessary for charging/proving obstruction etc. You only need the existence of the folder and document to show evidence. What the document says is neither here nor there as to whether it was in his possession, whether he hid it and whether he lied about it.

Obviously we could and should get Part 2 to see all of the obstruction efforts.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge clears the way for ...»Reply #16