Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Judge bars Musk's DOGE team from Social Security records in scathing ruling [View all]MayReasonRule
(3,398 posts)5. PDF Of Full MEMORANDUM OPINION
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.577321/gov.uscourts.mdd.577321.49.0.pdf
The American public may well applaud and support the Trump Administration’s mission
to root out fraud, waste, and bloat from federal agencies, including SSA, to the extent it exists.
But, by what means and methods?
The DOGE Team is essentially engaged in a fishing expedition at SSA, in search of a fraud
epidemic, based on little more than suspicion. It has launched a search for the proverbial needle
in the haystack, without any concrete knowledge that the needle is actually in the haystack.
To facilitate the expedition, SSA provided members of the SSA DOGE Team with
unbridled access to the personal and private data of millions of Americans, including but not
limited to Social Security numbers, medical records, mental health records, hospitalization records,
drivers’ license numbers, bank and credit card information, tax information, income history, work
history, birth and marriage certificates, and home and work addresses.
Yet, defendants, with so called experts on the DOGE Team, never identified or articulated
even a single reason for which the DOGE Team needs unlimited access to SSA’s entire record
systems, thereby exposing personal, confidential, sensitive, and private information that millions
of Americans entrusted to their government. Indeed, the government has not even attempted to
explain why a more tailored, measured, titrated approach is not suitable to the task. Instead, the
government simply repeats its incantation of a need to modernize the system and uncover fraud.
Its method of doing so is tantamount to hitting a fly with a sledgehammer.
In my view, plaintiffs are likely to succeed on their claim that such action is arbitrary and
capricious, and in violation of the Privacy Act and the APA. Plaintiffs have also demonstrated
that their members will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of a TRO, the equities tip in their
favor, and the TRO serves the public interest.
For the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs’ Motion (ECF 21) is granted. A Temporary
Restraining Order shall issue.








Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Judge bars Musk's DOGE team from Social Security records in scathing ruling [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Mar 20
OP
Among other things, DOGE asked for a huge bond and the judge set the bond at $750
LetMyPeopleVote
Mar 20
#8
I went to the article link and it didn't have much of anything but said it was scathing.
chowder66
Mar 20
#16
Nothing has scathed, let alone mildly interrupted, these Nazi knuckleheads since the rampage began.
Magoo48
Mar 20
#24
T.R.O. (Temporary Restraining Order) is to allow respondent time to prepare for full arguments at a later date.
3Hotdogs
Mar 20
#22
I thank Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander for her bravery; However-they will steal....
Bread and Circuses
Mar 20
#23
"A "scathing" ruling would have been an immediate order for the US Marshals to escort these random political lobbyists"
BumRushDaShow
Mar 21
#41
If a judge issues an order and an illegitimate executive countermands it
AmericaUnderSiege
Mar 21
#44