Latest Breaking News

Bluetus

(1,118 posts)

35. And where's the part about enforcement of the order?

Thu Mar 20, 2025, 10:11 PM

Mar 20

Robert' SCOTUS knows what a mess they have created, but now Roberts faces what, to him, is an even greater problem. Trump has already shown that he fully intends to disregard any ruling he doesn't like. There still could be a possibility that if SCOTUS affirmed the lower court, Trump would back off.

But there is, IMHO, a much greater probability that Trump would ignore the SCOTUS, just as he ignores the other courts. I mean, why would he change at this point?

So Roberts has to assume that if they EVER issue ANY ruling Trump doesn't like, it will be met with "The Supreme Court just made a bad ruling. I hereby declare it null and void." Lacking any enforcement power, that would be the end of the SCOTUS forever.

Roberts really has no choice. He cannot allow the SCOTUS to take any case where the SCOTUS would rule against Trump.

We have been in a "Constitutional crisis" at least since 2000. I wonder if any of these weenies that keep saying "Golly, we could maybe possibly some day soon be looking at something that feels a little like a Constitutional crisis" are starting to get it -- 25 YEARS TOO LATE.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge bars Musk's DOGE team from Social Security records in scathing ruling [View all] BumRushDaShow Mar 20 OP

Take that, you anti-American republicon, you BoRaGard Mar 20 #1

DOGE gets privacy but not citizens.. yeah, not hypocrites at all NotHardly Mar 20 #15

Silly Rabbit Poor People Aren't Citzens North Coast Lawyer Mar 20 #17

But the horse has left the barn, sadly. SunSeeker Mar 20 #2

Unchop that tree! purrmaid Mar 20 #7

yep. Can't undo it. bamagal62 Mar 20 #11

Where's the scathing part? chowder66 Mar 20 #3

Among other things, DOGE asked for a huge bond and the judge set the bond at $750 LetMyPeopleVote Mar 20 #8

The ruling , 137 pages , must scathe somewhere dweller Mar 20 #9

I went to the article link and it didn't have much of anything but said it was scathing. chowder66 Mar 20 #16

I read through some of the court docket crimycarny Mar 20 #12

Nothing has scathed, let alone mildly interrupted, these Nazi knuckleheads since the rampage began. Magoo48 Mar 20 #24

And where's the part about enforcement of the order? Bluetus Mar 20 #35

Cool, another ruling to ignore JBTaurus83 Mar 20 #4

When they know you don't mean it, it's just embarrassing. Magoo48 Mar 20 #25

It Is A Good Point Baron2024 Mar 20 #29

PDF Of Full MEMORANDUM OPINION MayReasonRule Mar 20 #5

Here is a link to the ruling LetMyPeopleVote Mar 20 #6

And will the police give a shit? progressoid Mar 20 #10

And when they completely ignore the ruling..... diverdownjt Mar 21 #39

The list of laws DOGE broke is quite impressive. Martin68 Mar 20 #13

More judicial "consequences" JoseBalow Mar 20 #14

More? Have there been any yet? Magoo48 Mar 20 #26

Since when DENVERPOPS Mar 20 #18

Toothpaste isn't going back in the tube Ruby the Liberal Mar 20 #19

To quite a certain South American dictator... orangecrush Mar 20 #20

Make it PERMANENT!!! calimary Mar 20 #21

T.R.O. (Temporary Restraining Order) is to allow respondent time to prepare for full arguments at a later date. 3Hotdogs Mar 20 #22

I thank Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander for her bravery; However-they will steal.... Bread and Circuses Mar 20 #23

Bravo, Judge Hollander! Bayard Mar 20 #27

All the courts are trending in a very encouraging way. Nixie Mar 20 #28

Civil Lawsuits Baron2024 Mar 20 #30

Here Is The Raskin Video Baron2024 Mar 20 #32

And, he wonders why his Damn Teslas Cha Mar 20 #31

I'm willing to bet he has all that information already. Autumn Mar 20 #33

Temporary restraining order? Don't make me laugh! Aussie105 Mar 20 #34

Good news Meowmee Mar 20 #36

Can we please send Elon and his goons on a one way trip to Mars already? Initech Mar 21 #37

Meaningless lonely bird Mar 21 #38

Bullshit. AmericaUnderSiege Mar 21 #40

"A "scathing" ruling would have been an immediate order for the US Marshals to escort these random political lobbyists" BumRushDaShow Mar 21 #41

Marshals enforce court orders, not executive orders. AmericaUnderSiege Mar 21 #42

They are still under DOJ BumRushDaShow Mar 21 #43

If a judge issues an order and an illegitimate executive countermands it AmericaUnderSiege Mar 21 #44

We all know what they are *supposed to do* BumRushDaShow Mar 21 #45

Exactly. AmericaUnderSiege Mar 21 #46