Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ol Janx Spirit

(673 posts)
18. That's not actually historically accurate. The Great Depression started in 1929 while the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act...
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 02:25 PM
Mar 2025

...wasn't enacted until June of 1930, so it could not have been the cause of the Great Depression. It may have exacerbated it--although even that point is in some dispute--but it did not cause it. The conditions we have in the world today are vastly different than they were in the 1920s, so it seems less likely that this type of monetary policy will lead to a depression, and they may not even lead to a recession. Tariffs have been such a huge instrument of economic policy worldwide for such a long time--tariffs were the primary funding mechanism of the federal government until the income tax began after 1913, and the second bill that George Washington signed was a tariff--that it is difficult to actually anticipate what will happen in the current climate. My point is that when Walmart uses their leverage to force Chinese companies to lower their prices to make up for the US-imposed tariff, the offshoot of that will fall heavily upon the workers that are already being exploited. The protectionist policies of the 17 and 1800s that were quite successful in standing up industries that America did not yet have really do not apply to today's world. And as the world's largest economy we may not even notice the real effects of it--just as we do not have to see the low-wage, child labor, and environmental destruction we currently promote in the rest of the world so we can have cheap disposable goods. It seems very likely that the real victims of this trade war will be the foreign workers--and possibly slave labor from our new El Salvadorian prison partner--offered up as fodder for our insatiable demand.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

OMG are the Waltons going to find out that they are not the gods they thought they were? LiberalArkie Mar 2025 #1
Reminds me of "The Man that said NO to Walmart" Born Free Mar 2025 #13
China has the advantage....even with a 20% add, its goods are still cheaper. We can't turn on new... dutch777 Mar 2025 #2
So if trump imposes tariffs on Chinese goods, chinese companies have to raise prices to Walmart. Walmart wants Chinese Srkdqltr Mar 2025 #3
Not exactly. The Chinese companies don't raise their prices; the tariff that Walmart has to pay to the US government Ol Janx Spirit Mar 2025 #4
And foreign prices will likely increase beyond the tariffs as demand will fall proportionally IbogaProject Mar 2025 #15
That's not actually historically accurate. The Great Depression started in 1929 while the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act... Ol Janx Spirit Mar 2025 #18
Weird headline. It is WalMart that is pressuring China. GreatGazoo Mar 2025 #5
The first sentence of the OP excerpt has this BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #6
China is still the one paying those tariffs, right? Bayard Mar 2025 #7
No - it's the people who IMPORT from China who would pay BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #8
I guess I forgot this.... Bayard Mar 2025 #10
When I saw your BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #12
Their cost of living is lower which is called a Comparative Advantage IbogaProject Mar 2025 #16
A "new" class of the populace were only recently able to afford to purchase what they make BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 #17
Alternatives Magoo48 Mar 2025 #9
So, they are blaiming the coming 20% price increase Miguelito Loveless Mar 2025 #11
MAGA shop at Walmart and they can't blame President Biden now for those tariffs and higher prices. kimbutgar Mar 2025 #14
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»China is turning up press...»Reply #18