Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

in2herbs

(3,700 posts)

3. The winner's margin was 734 votes out of the 60,000+ claimed to be fraudulent. So if 734 votes

Reply to Eugene (Original post)

Fri Apr 4, 2025, 03:44 PM

Apr 4

were verified to be true out of the 60,000+ claimed to be fraudulent, would 734 verified votes out of the 60,000+ confirm Riggs to be a winner???

This would be a more achievable hurdle, IMO.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

IbogaProject

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

North Carolina judges side with Republican colleague in close Supreme Court race [View all] Eugene Apr 4 OP

15 days dweller Apr 4 #1

Is it 15 business days? subterranean Apr 4 #4

Evil criminal rePUKE syndicate wolfie001 Apr 4 #2

The winner's margin was 734 votes out of the 60,000+ claimed to be fraudulent. So if 734 votes in2herbs Apr 4 #3

I'm not sure of your math.. Karma13612 Apr 4 #6

That clairifies the data. TY in2herbs Apr 4 #7

Those fckrs......eom Karma13612 Apr 4 #5