Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stopdiggin

(13,739 posts)
8. this is/was my understanding
Tue Apr 15, 2025, 11:45 AM
Apr 15

which means that the article is only telling us what we already knew. The judge's order was relatively meaningless in the face of files that were already gone at the time of the ruling. ( with the exception of - possibly - some kind of third party forensic retrieval. which, unfortunately, was not part of the judge's directive. )

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Signal War Plans Messages...»Reply #8