Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(164,762 posts)
58. Google is helpful
Sat Jul 5, 2025, 08:53 PM
Jul 2025

As an example, MD has apparently been working on theirs since March -

Deadbeat feds: State lawmakers draw up bills to respond if White House withholds payments

By: Jack Bowman - March 6, 2025 1:32 am

(snip)

“Essentially, we’re preparing for the possibility of the federal government acting as a deadbeat debtor and needing to find ways to collect congressionally approved funding,” Moon said Wednesday.

Moon said that the first of his two bills, HB1545, would authorize Comptroller Brooke Lierman, in consultation with the BPW, to withhold funds owed to the federal government in an amount equivalent to funds being withheld from Maryland. The bill defines the federal government as being delinquent in the case of “noncompliance with court decisions” related to federal spending. A spokesperson for the comptroller said the office was still reviewing the bills and was not able to immediately comment.

The second bill, HB1546, would direct Attorney General Anthony Brown to work with the Central Collections Unit to put liens on federal property in Maryland until the state is able to “resolve the payment obligations from the federal government.”

The bill states that Maryland would reserve jurisdiction with respect to any land that the federal government leases or holds in the state if they are found delinquent in their payments.

(snip)


So for example, here is their draft textf for HB1545 (PDF) - https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2025RS/bills/hb/hb1545f.pdf

HOUSE BILL 1545
P1, P3 EMERGENCY BILL 5lr3639
By: Delegates Moon, J. Lewis, Atterbeary, Barnes, Clippinger, Korman,
Pena–Melnyk, and Wilson

Introduced and read first time: February 25, 2025
Assigned to: Rules and Executive Nominations

A BILL ENTITLED

AN ACT concerning1

Board of Public Works – Comptroller – Delinquent Federal Funds2


FOR the purpose of authorizing the Comptroller, in consultation with the Board of Public3
Works, to withhold up to a certain amount of State payments to the federal4
government under certain conditions; authorizing the Board of Public Works to5
determine the federal government to be delinquent in federal funds owed to the State6
under certain circumstances; and generally relating to delinquent federal funds.7


BY adding to8
Article – State Finance and Procurement9
Section 2–109 and 10–20810
Annotated Code of Maryland11
(2021 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement)12


BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments,13
Article – State Finance and Procurement14
Section 10–10115
Annotated Code of Maryland16
(2021 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement)17


BY adding to18
Article – State Government19
Section 4–11520
Annotated Code of Maryland21
(2021 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement)22


SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND,23

That the Laws of Maryland read as follows:24

Article – State Finance and Procurement25


2–109.1

WHEN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS FOUND NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH2
COURT DECISIONS UPHOLDING FEDERAL CONGRESSIONALLY APPROVED SPENDING3
AS PROVIDED IN § 10–208 OF THIS ARTICLE AND § 4–115 OF THE STATE4
GOVERNMENT ARTICLE, THE COMPTROLLER MAY WITHHOLD STATE PAYMENTS TO5
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN AN AMOUNT UP TO THE TOTAL OF DELINQUENT6
FEDERAL FUNDS.7

10–101.8

In this title, “Board” means the Board of Public Works.9

10–208.10

THE BOARD MAY DETERMINE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO BE11
DELINQUENT IN FEDERAL FUNDS OWED TO THE STATE IN THE EVENT OF FEDERAL12
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT DECISIONS UPHOLDING CONGRESSIONALLY13
APPROVED SPENDING.14

Article – State Government15


4–115.16

FOR DELINQUENT FEDERAL FUNDS AS DETERMINED UNDER § 10–208 OF THE17
STATE FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT ARTICLE, THE COMPTROLLER, IN18
CONSULTATION WITH THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS, MAY WITHHOLD DELINQUENT19
FEDERAL FUNDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH § 2–109 OF THE STATE FINANCE AND20
PROCUREMENT ARTICLE.21


SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That, if any provision of this Act or22
the application of any provision of this Act to any person or circumstance is held invalid for23
any reason in a court of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity does not affect other24
provisions or any other application of this Act that can be given effect without the invalid25
provision or application, and for this purpose the provisions of this Act are declared26
severable.27

SECTION 3. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act is an emergency28
measure, is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health or safety, has29
been passed by a yea and nay vote supported by three–fifths of all the members elected to30
each of the two Houses of the General Assembly, and shall take effect from the date it is31
enacted.


The above has citations that specifically reference financial sections of the MD state code (if you want to take the time to look up the MD state laws and regulations).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I have been saying that the states who he moves against should do something like this. OldBaldy1701E Jul 2025 #1
I don't know if it's legal but it's worth a try. COL Mustard Jul 2025 #21
It definitely doesn't sound legal, but it can at least delay and maybe deny state funds to an asset ancianita Jul 2025 #35
They can drag their feet like tfg, tie it up in courts and not comply with the rulings.. What are they gonna do, sue? mitch96 Jul 2025 #46
They'll grab him off the street and send him to Justice matters. Jul 2025 #51
Exactly. (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Jul 2025 #61
I don't see how that would work FBaggins Jul 2025 #2
They would just move their assets. Hornedfrog2000 Jul 2025 #3
OUR ASSETS! BidenRocks Jul 2025 #38
Can the garnish income from the properties? Scrivener7 Jul 2025 #6
can't they prevent the government from accessing their properties? LymphocyteLover Jul 2025 #7
No. In fact the Biden administration proved this FBaggins Jul 2025 #12
The "Liens on their property" is more of an analogy/euphemistic term BumRushDaShow Jul 2025 #9
The example given is awful FBaggins Jul 2025 #13
"Withholding payroll taxes for state employees screws the employees" BumRushDaShow Jul 2025 #17
Not a crime at all. There's no federal statute mandating the process whereby withholding makes its way to the Feds. paleotn Jul 2025 #27
Let me clarify - the employees are not screwed Klaus Hergersheimer Jul 2025 #31
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2025 #62
Exactly, good info Farmer-Rick Jul 2025 #18
I wrote the following downthread BumRushDaShow Jul 2025 #24
Thanks for the info. Farmer-Rick Jul 2025 #26
In theory they could foreclose Nasruddin Jul 2025 #30
Isnt selling off public lands one of the many problems in the dump bill? quakerboy Jul 2025 #55
That part was dropped a few days ago FBaggins Jul 2025 #57
Nice idea but Supreme Court will eventually intervene against states. Is K-9 funding mandated by congress? lostnfound Jul 2025 #4
The education funding was mandated by Congress, yes LymphocyteLover Jul 2025 #8
How would retaliation from pedo Trump actually work? Farmer-Rick Jul 2025 #23
How would the states get the employer to give them the money instead of it being sent directly to the US Treasury? MichMan Jul 2025 #49
Aside from regular state taxes you mean? Farmer-Rick Jul 2025 #50
I didn't see any specifics in the OP about what type of state payments would be held. MichMan Jul 2025 #54
Google is helpful BumRushDaShow Jul 2025 #58
The "employer" in this case is *THE STATE* BumRushDaShow Jul 2025 #53
See paleotn response to that upthread. Dixiegrrrl Jul 2025 #29
Turn off utilities. Historic NY Jul 2025 #5
This has been tried before, didn't work. DUU Jul 2025 #10
Welcome to DU orangecrush Jul 2025 #15
Got a link on that? NJCher Jul 2025 #19
There is nothing in that article, nor an earlier NBC one, that says anything about "federal property". BumRushDaShow Jul 2025 #20
That doesn't sound like the same thing Farmer-Rick Jul 2025 #25
Schlump definitely has some form of dementia. ShazzieB Jul 2025 #60
Good strategy. You play the game presented to you, and stand tall. /.nt bucolic_frolic Jul 2025 #11
YES orangecrush Jul 2025 #14
If it's a "secret weapon" why announce it? NoMoreRepugs Jul 2025 #16
I think the term "secret" is more "slang" than literal. BumRushDaShow Jul 2025 #22
I need a "rhetorical question" emoji. NoMoreRepugs Jul 2025 #40
DUer tanyev uses this BumRushDaShow Jul 2025 #42
Writers NJCher Jul 2025 #37
I say "YES" let's do it!! h2ebits Jul 2025 #28
Trump's properties maliaSmith Jul 2025 #32
Fight the POWER!!! sunflowerseed Jul 2025 #33
Isn't this legally just a series of setoffs? rzemanfl Jul 2025 #34
I'm for it hope California does it. republianmushroom Jul 2025 #36
The Fed may have the bldg or whatever, BidenRocks Jul 2025 #39
I don't think this has to do with what they call "real property" (buildings) BumRushDaShow Jul 2025 #41
Please see my post #34 above regarding setoff. rzemanfl Jul 2025 #43
I saw it BumRushDaShow Jul 2025 #48
Newsom is considering doing something similar... AntiFascist Jul 2025 #44
I am glad they are exploring ways to shift money to their own state from the fed mdbl Jul 2025 #45
Excelent idea! Josiesdad Jul 2025 #47
This is part of what I see as a soft secession Metaphorical Jul 2025 #52
This is soveirgn citizen tactics. Jacson6 Jul 2025 #56
Problem is BumRushDaShow Jul 2025 #59
Right you are BRDS - the executive branch is provoking Blue States into "getting even" as the only option left FakeNoose Jul 2025 #63
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Liens on their property'...»Reply #58