Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,669 posts)
19. Exactly correct. And in this case it's even simpler
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 08:49 AM
Jul 2025

This isn't the first ruling saying that the executive has the power to substantially change staffing in the administration and that district judges can't pause that action nationally while they hear a case about such restructuring.

It isn't a surprise that - once that is clear - the administration would file "emergency" requests saying essentially "Hey... can you tell this judge the same thing please?" or that the court would respond quickly with something like this unless a lower court would apply the new understanding on their own.

It' the lenthy dissents that are perhaps not surprising - but at least out of the norm. Usually it's one paragraph ruling followed by a single sentence saying "Justices X & Y would have not have granted the request"

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The reality is simple angrychair Jul 2025 #1
Or, third, they are in on it. Blues Heron Jul 2025 #2
Current SC loves Executive Power NCDem47 Jul 2025 #3
CNN's take & link to court doc GJGCA Jul 2025 #4
I'm getting a bit tired of blaming Trump as the real ones doing it are the cowardly Congressional Republican. cstanleytech Jul 2025 #5
There's plenty to go around. Harker Jul 2025 #6
Yes but the Congressional Republicans own 99% of it for refusing to do their Constitutional job because they are cowards cstanleytech Jul 2025 #9
The Trump Supreme Whorehouse doesn't disappoint. dalton99a Jul 2025 #7
How lucky we were in 2021 when the same court rejected all the elections related lawsuits question everything Jul 2025 #8
From Politico: GJGCA Jul 2025 #10
The OP excerpt mentioned that BumRushDaShow Jul 2025 #11
Yes, and THAT is bluestarone Jul 2025 #12
They do this when they are rulling on requests on their "shadow docket" BumRushDaShow Jul 2025 #13
Exactly correct. And in this case it's even simpler FBaggins Jul 2025 #19
I think the problem here though BumRushDaShow Jul 2025 #20
I took the Fork in the Road (DRP)... SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2025 #21
Yes, and also had link to full court order... GJGCA Jul 2025 #14
When I do these OPs BumRushDaShow Jul 2025 #15
And so the decline to third world status continues groundloop Jul 2025 #16
I am wondering when sabbat hunter Jul 2025 #17
A dumbed down populace will be easier to control kimbutgar Jul 2025 #18
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court allows Trum...»Reply #19