Latest Breaking News

underpants

(196,022 posts)

25. Absolutely. I've read some of it and it's saying Russia didn't change votes

Sat Jul 19, 2025, 11:41 AM

Jul 2025

which no one has claimed. They did flood social media in favor of Trump and got personal information to specifically target certain areas and demographics.

I’m not sure how they think Obama did this. He was POTUS so I’m sure it’s just the presence of his name on documents.

It’s Tulsi freaking Gabbard for crying out loud

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Tulsi Gabbard calls for Obama to be prosecuted over 2016 election claims [View all] pnwmom Jul 2025 OP

They know how to play the ill informed MAGA minions like a fiddle; D. Spaulding Jul 2025 #1

They have to accuse others of treasonous conspiracy to cover up MadameButterfly Jul 2025 #21

Winner, winner odins folly Jul 2025 #36

Aren't these dumbfucks still "investigating" 2020? Now they want to go back even farther? Oy. Karasu Jul 2025 #2

Desperately seeking attention Raven123 Jul 2025 #3

Desperately seeking distractions for a child raper Captain Zero Jul 2025 #9

Despicable. A long-time Putin mouthpiece. She's manufacturing bullshit to please Trump. emulatorloo Jul 2025 #4

The truth is the best defense against nonsense. bucolic_frolic Jul 2025 #5

And yet, the Epstein story is still in the news. jls4561 Jul 2025 #6

Former President Obama is immune to prosecution for any official acts that he performed during his presidency. Linda ladeewolf Jul 2025 #7

Good point! nt pnwmom Jul 2025 #8

And besides that - Statute of Limitations Captain Zero Jul 2025 #10

Can they get around that by retroactive impeachment? 0rganism Jul 2025 #12

When I see this it just confirms the Trump Epstein even more JI7 Jul 2025 #11

This has to be one of the biggest examples ever of making shit up out of nothing Wiz Imp Jul 2025 #13

Hmmm... GiqueCee Jul 2025 #24

Absolutely. I've read some of it and it's saying Russia didn't change votes underpants Jul 2025 #25

Sorry but the Steele Dossier was funded by Democratic groups; see snot Jul 2025 #31

Gabbard's document is pure garbage. Hell, it even refers to the "Deep State" Wiz Imp Jul 2025 #32

Epstein Red Mountain Jul 2025 #14

Look! Look! It's Halley's Comet! thought crime Jul 2025 #34

Turncoat Tulsi is doing her darndest to get back on the Orange Fascist's good side after... LudwigPastorius Jul 2025 #15

yep. she wasn't included in meetings after that so now she has to suck off the old deflated orleans Jul 2025 #16

As i remember Obama didn't say jsck about Figarosmom Jul 2025 #17

Go for it orangecrush Jul 2025 #18

Tulsi's idea of treason BGRD Jul 2025 #19

I don't recall President Obama saying anything about the 2016 election and Russian interference - cab67 Jul 2025 #20

Immunity? But of course. twodogsbarking Jul 2025 #22

Be careful what you wish for... GiqueCee Jul 2025 #23

She's the high school girl --or boy -- who would sell their soul to sit at the cool kid's table. /nt artemisia1 Jul 2025 #26

She's seriously deranged. Dave Bowman Jul 2025 #27

DOJ will arrest Obama and other high-level Democrats and then Eliot Rosewater Jul 2025 #28

Our human intelligence sources must be completely dry WSHazel Jul 2025 #29

Can you imagine how nervous they must be? Red Mountain Jul 2025 #30

Team Russia's The Wizard Jul 2025 #33

Investigate her russian-asset carcass for tainted foreign bribe money she's received. mpcamb Jul 2025 #40

Knows otherwise and still playing opposite game anyway? Brainfodder Jul 2025 #35

And now, the Show Trials maxsolomon Jul 2025 #37

They really want the conversation on anything except Epstein. Torchlight Jul 2025 #38

Attempted payback for Obama expelling 35 Russian diplomats for hacking in 2016 wishstar Jul 2025 #39