Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(5,686 posts)

3. She wasn't named or charged during the original case

Mon Jul 28, 2025, 12:47 PM

Jul 2025

So I hope they say NO !!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ghislaine Maxwell makes pitch to Supreme Court [View all] groundloop Jul 2025 OP

Go ahead John Roberts, I triple-dog-dare you... Fiendish Thingy Jul 2025 #1

You often have clever readings of the Court Prairie Gates Jul 2025 #5

Sure, that's a possibility Fiendish Thingy Jul 2025 #6

They will rule Miguelito Loveless Jul 2025 #19

She wasn't named or charged during the original case IbogaProject Jul 2025 #3

A convenient way to avoid pardoning or commuting her tishaLA Jul 2025 #7

IMHO and I am not an attorney UpInArms Jul 2025 #8

But she's white and rich, so she thinks she's getting out Attilatheblond Jul 2025 #11

See post #16. onenote Jul 2025 #17

This is silly. Jacson6 Jul 2025 #10

Holder of the evidence has magical powers Attilatheblond Jul 2025 #12

The plea deal was broadly worded and she falls within its scope. onenote Jul 2025 #16

I think the opposite here. bluestarone Jul 2025 #18

Did Epstein ACUALLY FULFILL ALL the terms 3825-87867 Jul 2025 #21

Yes. It was a sweetheart deal. Didn't require that much. onenote Jul 2025 #22

drumpf always gets others to do his dirty work for him JoseBalow Jul 2025 #14

This whole scenario is disgusting mdbl Jul 2025 #23