Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(168,625 posts)
31. Believe it or not
Sun Aug 3, 2025, 05:17 PM
Aug 2025
even GOP-appointed judges are putting off retiring because of what is happening. (link from a couple weeks ago)

The Atlantic just had a piece on this yesterday -

Republicans Might Regret Putting Emil Bove on the Bench

By Brendan Ballou
August 2, 2025, 8 AM ET

(snip)

Since he first took office, in 2017, Trump has maintained the support of Senate Republicans in part through a simple bargain: They put up with his obvious unfitness for office, and in exchange, he appoints reliably conservative judges to the federal courts. But by appointing Bove—whose only apparent loyalty is to his own ambition, not to any particular legal philosophy—the GOP might have limited its own ability to appoint judges in the future. This is because the president typically gets to appoint new judges only when old ones die, retire, or move into the quasi-retirement position of “senior status.” And some judges, even conservative ones who would otherwise be happy to let a Republican president pick their replacement, are likely to delay their retirement rather than hand Trump the opportunity to make more Bove-style appointments.

The evidence suggests that this is already happening. Many federal judges time their retirement based on which party is in power: Democrat-appointed judges are likelier to retire when a Democrat is president, Republican-appointed judges when a Republican is. So far through Trump’s second term, however, conservative judges aren’t retiring at the pace they typically do. An analysis by Bloomberg Law found that 26 judicial seats opened up from the beginning of the year through the first five months of Trump’s first term, as did 57 judicial seats during the same period of Joe Biden’s presidency. By contrast, through June 1 of his second term, Trump gained just 16 vacancies to fill. Ursula Ungaro, a retired judge appointed by George W. Bush, told Bloomberg Law that she’d heard a “hint or two” that her former peers “would stay beyond their eligibility for senior status to see what happens toward the end of the Trump administration.”

(snip)

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Less than a week to start provoking a backlash. calimary Aug 2025 #1
Nothing will be done Dr. Shepper Aug 2025 #2
Looks like a few people agree with you NJCher Aug 2025 #3
Despite all the negatives on this guy, he gets a lifetime appointment. Katinfl Aug 2025 #4
Isn't impeachment... GiqueCee Aug 2025 #5
I forgot about impeachment for Bove. Yes, that would be an option. Katinfl Aug 2025 #6
It's a fantasy, considering you need 67 votes in the Senate Polybius Aug 2025 #21
The only way that would happen is if the Dems are in the majority. Katinfl Aug 2025 #24
If the Dems are in the majority... GiqueCee Aug 2025 #26
That takes a majority in the House COL Mustard Aug 2025 #7
That's why I said, "For now." GiqueCee Aug 2025 #8
Stay optimistic, my friend. COL Mustard Aug 2025 #15
Not gonna happen Polybius Aug 2025 #20
Trump has shit on the plate of so many people Dan Aug 2025 #17
I appreciate your optimism and I truly hope you are correct. Katinfl Aug 2025 #23
He wasn't put in office by "decent people in America" maxsolomon Aug 2025 #35
You mentioned death? I am sure folks will dance in the streets if that happens. Trueblue1968 Aug 2025 #22
An honest question PJMcK Aug 2025 #9
The 3rd Circuit has 14 "active" (non-senior) judges BumRushDaShow Aug 2025 #11
He's 1 of 14 TommyT139 Aug 2025 #29
Believe it or not BumRushDaShow Aug 2025 #31
We are not giving up. thought crime Aug 2025 #16
No one said give up Miguelito Loveless Aug 2025 #36
re: "Nothing will be done" -- Something IS being done, that's the point of the article. thesquanderer Aug 2025 #14
it seems like there's a universal law NJCher Aug 2025 #19
That's wishful thinking I'm afraid. FBaggins Aug 2025 #32
Negate Trump. All else is secondary. Then move on. tirebiter Aug 2025 #10
Where is that one poster who says "they cant do that"? Hornedfrog2000 Aug 2025 #12
Say F-you to his judicial orders? 2na fisherman Aug 2025 #13
The Trump kakistocracy continues to grow Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 2025 #18
What Ballou says makes no sense to this layman. What possible form could a "legal system backlash" take, anyway. ancianita Aug 2025 #25
I have always posted BumRushDaShow Aug 2025 #27
And as Americans we have always believed that. ancianita Aug 2025 #28
Shouldnt he be removed from the legal profession Progressive dog Aug 2025 #30
As some have noted, impeachment isn't very likely, at least not in the foreseeable future. ShazzieB Aug 2025 #33
Am thinking that so much shit is breaking that somethings gotta give... All is not lost. Battle on tazcat Aug 2025 #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Come to regret': Federal...»Reply #31