Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

fujiyamasan

(1,645 posts)

11. Same with JD...

Reply to slightlv (Reply #8)

Fri Nov 7, 2025, 02:51 AM

Nov 2025

He’s gotta dump the brown devil worshipping woman and get the blonde Christian widow with the leather pants.

Now, if the Supreme Court explicitly banned relationships with furniture… that’s a different story.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

EuterpeThelo 2MuchNoise

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court v. Gay Marriage: Jim Obergefell's Warning as Precedent Tested [View all] BumRushDaShow Nov 2025 OP

Is there any reference to marriage in the Constitution? sinkingfeeling Nov 2025 #1

No but there is the Equal Protection Clause to the 14th Amendment TomSlick Nov 2025 #3

I totally agree dickthegrouch Nov 2025 #5

You can't have two classes of citizens COL Mustard Nov 2025 #7

He should be concerned. maxsolomon Nov 2025 #2

Ginny and Clarence Should Worry Too 2na fisherman Nov 2025 #4

You got that right! IzzaNuDay Nov 2025 #6

I'm not sure Clarence isn't looking for some face-saving way to get rid of Ginni, actually. nt slightlv Nov 2025 #8

Same with JD... fujiyamasan Nov 2025 #11

I think the Supreme Court is corrupt as hell CozyMystery Nov 2025 #9

This would have to be all or nothing by the USSC. valleyrogue Nov 2025 #10

"Kicking it back to the states ala Dobbs doesn't work in this case because some benefits... are federal." BumRushDaShow Nov 2025 #12