Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Zorro

(18,508 posts)
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 09:52 PM Nov 2025

House Republicans move to censure Plaskett over text messages with Epstein [View all]

Source: Washington Post

Rep. Ralph Norman (R-South Carolina), who introduced the resolution, said it was “beyond comprehension” that Plaskett would communicate with Epstein during a hearing.

House Republicans introduced a resolution Tuesday to censure and strip a key committee assignment from Del. Stacey Plaskett (D), the nonvoting delegate representing the U.S. Virgin Islands, for texting with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein during a 2019 congressional hearing, an exchange that was included in the recently released trove of documents from Epstein’s estate.

A Washington Post analysis of the texts, matched up with time-stamps from the hearing, showed that Epstein appeared to be watching in real time as Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump’s formal personal attorney and fixer, was testifying before the House Oversight Committee about Trump. According to the documents released, Epstein and Plaskett texted throughout the day, and their messages indicate Epstein may have influenced what questions to ask Cohen.

Rep. Ralph Norman (R-South Carolina), who introduced the resolution to censure Plaskett, said it was “beyond comprehension” that Plaskett would coordinate with Epstein on official proceedings. If passed, the resolution would direct the House Ethics Committee to investigate the extent of Plaskett’s relationship with Epstein and remove her from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

“The American people expect honesty, the American people expect integrity and judgment from their elected officials. They expect members of Congress to conduct themselves with one word — decency — not to seek advice from a predator who exploited minor children,” Norman said on the House floor Tuesday.

Read more: https://wapo.st/44dD0o7

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If only Republicans were as eager to pursue Epstein's predator friends dlk Nov 2025 #1
i agree with norman in general, but rampartd Nov 2025 #2
Epstein had been convicted as a sex offender of minors eleven years earlier MichMan Nov 2025 #3
i get it, but if court decisions are the standard. rampartd Nov 2025 #4
Have no idea of what that has anything to do with Plaskett and Epstein texting each other in a congressional hearing MichMan Nov 2025 #5
I hadn't heard about any of this before now, slightlv Nov 2025 #8
Here is a clip from the Washington Post of some of it MichMan Nov 2025 #10
Thank you... slightlv Nov 2025 #26
Epstein was acting as an informant to Plaskett on Trump/Cohen for that 2019 hearing. SunSeeker Nov 2025 #13
having a hard time following the defense here stopdiggin Nov 2025 #9
Oops. Well that kinda' sucks. Well, okay - really, really blows? stopdiggin Nov 2025 #6
Plaskett did nothing wrong. She was using Epstein as an informant. SunSeeker Nov 2025 #14
believe that if you want to stopdiggin Nov 2025 #19
Yes, during the hearing, so she could get info on what Cohen was talking about. SunSeeker Nov 2025 #20
you do you. Meanwhile, I am going to criticize Democrats when they make egregious ethical stopdiggin Nov 2025 #22
There was nothing unethical about Plaskett getting info to prosecute Trump from his former best friend. SunSeeker Nov 2025 #23
Disagree on the very strongest of terms stopdiggin Nov 2025 #24
You've made your opinion quite clear. I, and House Democrats, do not share it. SunSeeker Nov 2025 #25
Enough already RedArkGuy Nov 2025 #28
Don't be absurd. I advocate no such thing. stopdiggin Nov 2025 #29
I support censuring her. You cannot be appearing to take Wiz Imp Nov 2025 #7
I don't. She was not taking direction from Epstein, she was using him as an informant. SunSeeker Nov 2025 #15
I'd also add that whistleblowers . . . RedArkGuy Nov 2025 #27
Wasn't She One of the Impeachment Managers? Deep State Witch Nov 2025 #11
Yes she was. But this is NOT payback Wiz Imp Nov 2025 #16
It totally was payback for her prosecution of Trump. SunSeeker Nov 2025 #21
The motion FAILED. Plaskett did nothing wrong; she was talking to an scumbag informant to get info on Trump/Cohen. SunSeeker Nov 2025 #12
Who knew more about Trump and his dirty dealings that Jeffrey Epstein? mackdaddy Nov 2025 #17
Rep. Ralph Norman (R-South Carolina), is this lap puppy republianmushroom Nov 2025 #18
Gosh I wonder what sets her apart in their minds mahina Nov 2025 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House Republicans move to...