Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

groundloop

(13,736 posts)
Mon Dec 1, 2025, 04:00 PM Dec 2025

White House says admiral ordered follow-on strike on alleged drug boat, insists attack was lawful [View all]

Source: AP News

The White House said Monday that a Navy admiral acted “within his authority and the law” when he ordered a second, follow-up strike on an alleged drug boat in the Caribbean Sea in a September U.S. military operation that has come under bipartisan scrutiny.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt offered the justification for the Sept. 2 strike after lawmakers from both parties on Sunday announced support for congressional reviews of U.S. military strikes against vessels suspected of smuggling drugs in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean, citing a published report that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a verbal order for a second strike that killed survivors on the boat in that incident.

Leavitt in her comments to reporters on Monday did not dispute a Washington Post report that there were survivors after the initial strike in the incident. Her explanation came after President Donald Trump a day earlier said that he “wouldn’t have wanted that — not a second strike” when asked about the incident.

“Secretary Hegseth authorized Admiral Bradley to conduct these kinetic strikes,” said Leavitt, referring to U.S. Navy Vice Admiral Frank Bradley, who at the time was the commander of Joint Special Operations Command. “Admiral Bradley worked well within his authority and the law, directing the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States of America was eliminated.”

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/trump-venezuela-hegseth-maduro-512c66b99b2a13e9d1a3ed2699e78228

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I guess "kinetic strike" is a nicer way of saying murder. groundloop Dec 2025 #1
What did dubya call it when we struck first? slightlv Dec 2025 #11
Preemptive War Diraven Dec 2025 #12
"White House says" bucolic_frolic Dec 2025 #2
Whoa.............. Lovie777 Dec 2025 #3
I see they are trying to throw him under the bus. drray23 Dec 2025 #4
I think you're referring to Admiral Holsey COL Mustard Dec 2025 #17
You are absolutely correct. drray23 Dec 2025 #20
"It's his fault! He did what we ordered him to do! Blame him (but credit us)!" Torchlight Dec 2025 #5
They lie to protect their dear murderer. Justice matters. Dec 2025 #34
Lawmakers spoke privately to Trump's top general after boat strike revelations Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2025 #6
Does "no one left alive" sound like .....witnesses? Dixiegrrrl Dec 2025 #23
Because the boats are not trafficking drugs and they are covering up their murders. travelingthrulife Dec 2025 #24
I hope you GD generals are paying close attention. Irish_Dem Dec 2025 #7
This is exactly why it is in the best interests of the service members to refuse illegal orders. Midnight Writer Dec 2025 #8
Trump eventually throws EVERYONE under the bus. Irish_Dem Dec 2025 #9
Exactly Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2025 #25
Sure. Totally lawful! Aussie105 Dec 2025 #10
All I know is, one guy holds the golden ticket, his immunity card. Buddyzbuddy Dec 2025 #13
The US is not a signatory to the ICC. tblue37 Dec 2025 #26
Thank you, I'm aware of that. Buddyzbuddy Dec 2025 #33
This sinking, disabled vehicle with dazed and wounded survivors was a "threat to the United States?" Prairie Gates Dec 2025 #14
That's not going to play well in the officer class or the rank and file. paleotn Dec 2025 #15
We will see. kacekwl Dec 2025 #29
Uhh.. Firing on shipwrecked people is the textbook definition of a war crime.. Litterally 18.3.1.1 LiberalArkie Dec 2025 #16
Lies and more lies, upon yet more lies. Where's the damn evidence??????? Ford_Prefect Dec 2025 #18
Maybe they were in the boat. tblue37 Dec 2025 #27
Admiral Bradley going under The Chump Bus duckworth969 Dec 2025 #19
Hesgeth should be arrested and put on trial for murder Akakoji Dec 2025 #21
Since it is NEVER legal, BidenRocks Dec 2025 #22
Ok assholes, show up kacekwl Dec 2025 #28
We didn't do it, but if we did it's legal. CanonRay Dec 2025 #30
And that guy over there will be pardoned thought crime Dec 2025 #32
No, it's not lawful to kill defenseless combatants or civilians Mysterian Dec 2025 #31
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House says admiral ...