Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(168,973 posts)
Tue Dec 2, 2025, 10:15 AM Dec 2025

IRS Agents to Review OnlyFans Content to Determine if It's 'Pornographic' [View all]

Source: MEDIAite

Dec 1st, 2025, 11:43 pm


Some IRS agents won’t have to worry about getting in trouble for watching porn at work, because part of their job duties will literally involve reviewing content on OnlyFans and other online creators.

The issue, according to a report by Andrew Duehren at The New York Times, is the interpretation of a restriction on the “no tax on tips” deduction passed as part of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” Act that says that tips earned for prostitution or “pornographic activity” are not eligible.

The legislation didn’t offer much additional guidance, and the IRS has yet to issue any statements clarifying what exactly constitutes “pornographic activity,” leaving the taxing agency in a similar boat as Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart when he endeavored to define “obscenity” in the 1964 case of Jacobellis v. Ohio: “I know it when I see it.” And apparently, the IRS expects its agents to “know it when they see it” as far as determining eligibility for this deduction.

There are almost five million creator accounts on OnlyFans, reported the Times, but it’s not clear how many of them are Americans and subject to U.S. tax laws, and not all of them are posting pornographic or sexual content. It’s also “unclear,” wrote Duehren, “whether strippers could claim the tips deduction,” because “[t]here is plenty of activity that an accountant or tax lawyer could argue is merely titillating.”

Read more: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/irs-agents-to-review-onlyfans-content-to-determine-if-its-pornographic/





How about auditing a couple hundred billionaires and a purported "trillionaire"?
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will they look at Melania's nude photos while they're livetohike Dec 2025 #1
They hiring? Temp work? Prairie Gates Dec 2025 #2
😂 underpants Dec 2025 #4
Epstein. twodogsbarking Dec 2025 #3
And... 2MuchNoise Dec 2025 #20
The Puritans in charge bucolic_frolic Dec 2025 #5
Trump's probably wasn't lonely bird Dec 2025 #8
Sesame Street too will be examined. twodogsbarking Dec 2025 #6
Especially Bert and Ernie BumRushDaShow Dec 2025 #7
Probably the "Donald Grump" character they had in the 80s. They knew. twodogsbarking Dec 2025 #9
Those episodes were why after years of GOP threats, he killed the CPB. BumRushDaShow Dec 2025 #15
Damn! James48 Dec 2025 #10
Instead of looking for actual tax evasion by the wealthy and corporations ? ChicagoTeamster Dec 2025 #11
Priorities, priorities. KPN Dec 2025 #12
Maybe they will see their spouses in the vids. twodogsbarking Dec 2025 #13
That could make for an awkward moment at the office Christmas party. rubbersole Dec 2025 #26
Is porn tax-deductible? Asking for a friend. NT mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2025 #14
How much are they making the agents pay? Emrys Dec 2025 #16
Want to boost your views OF creators? Aviation Pro Dec 2025 #17
will they be able to publish the guidance Old Crank Dec 2025 #18
Project 2025 again Nigrum Cattus Dec 2025 #19
Aren't most of those authors women? FakeNoose Dec 2025 #22
Porn supports a big portion of the intenet... Wounded Bear Dec 2025 #21
One 2020 study reported that 12% of websites are dedicated to pornography. ancianita Dec 2025 #23
Thank you! Botany Dec 2025 #25
The pornography determination is a fig leaf for yet another attack on women as wage-earners. Efilroft Sul Dec 2025 #24
Project 2025 was founded and financed by theoretical "Puritans". rubbersole Dec 2025 #27
One of the funniest threads in a long time! dickthegrouch Dec 2025 #28
To access some OF content... mwooldri Dec 2025 #29
Yeah, on OF any "pornographic" content is behind a paywall...nt Wounded Bear Dec 2025 #30
Maybe. Maybe not. mwooldri Dec 2025 #32
Free market economics...nt Wounded Bear Dec 2025 #33
Why? Is the money a site makes different with their clothes off? mdbl Dec 2025 #31
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»IRS Agents to Review Only...