Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(172,461 posts)
Tue Jan 6, 2026, 06:07 PM Jan 2026

Funding to Be Blocked For Attack on Greenland Under New Proposal [View all]

Source: Newsweek

Published Jan 06, 2026 at 05:07 AM EST updated Jan 06, 2026 at 09:05 AM EST


Senator Ruben Gallego is moving to block any U.S. military action in Greenland, introducing an amendment to the annual defense spending bill that would bar funding as he warned against getting involved in "more stupid wars of conquest."

The Democratic senator's comments come after President Donald Trump reiterated his wish to seize control of Greenland in an interview with The Atlantic on Sunday and separately to reporters aboard Air Force One.

Gallego provided no further information about the nature of the amendment and Newsweek has contacted his office and the White House for further comment, outside of normal working hours.

Why It Matters

Greenland is an autonomous part of the Kingdom of Denmark and Trump’s repeated pledges to obtain the resource-rich island has raised concern in Copenhagen and NATO, of which it is a key member. Trump said on Sunday that the U.S. needed Greenland for “national security” reasons and that it was “covered with Russian and Chinese ships" prompting alarm among the international community—and some lawmakers, such as Senator Gallego.

Read more: https://www.newsweek.com/funding-to-be-blocked-for-attack-on-greenland-under-new-proposal-11313183

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thank friggin' God! And this better have the support of EVERY SINGLE Democrat! Scrivener7 Jan 2026 #1
At least he can't claim its to stop drugs from comimg to the US this time Bayard Jan 2026 #7
Push hard bdamomma Jan 2026 #11
Now we know Katcat Jan 2026 #14
scared nazis vapor2 Jan 2026 #27
Ya, I'm sure Trump's going to not violate that. cstanleytech Jan 2026 #2
Maybe he'll try. But it needs to be done. Scrivener7 Jan 2026 #3
I'm not disagreeing, I'm simply saying he knows his co-conspirator Republicans in Congress won't help stop him. cstanleytech Jan 2026 #5
There has to be some line. Right here he's threatening to start World War 3 by Scrivener7 Jan 2026 #6
You'd almost think Katcat Jan 2026 #13
I have a better chance at hitting the lottery than the Republicans have of finding a line they won't cross. cstanleytech Jan 2026 #16
"attacking Greenland and Denmark" without their consent is... Justice matters. Jan 2026 #20
Maybe not. Still it is a great move. mahina Jan 2026 #4
I think he will. Just like the Pentagon shuffled to get the billion to fix his free plane Autumn Jan 2026 #15
Two assassinations attempts on Trump failed AverageOldGuy Jan 2026 #8
What we have bdamomma Jan 2026 #12
CANNOT even f'in believe this is a topic. We are a ROGUE nation. 70%? are not on board? I hope Evolve Dammit Jan 2026 #9
What they involve themselves in is the definition of "State-sponsored terrorism" Justice matters. Jan 2026 #18
I do not believe that Trump will use the military to takeover Greenland but rather Bev54 Jan 2026 #10
Lutnick has a business interest in Greenland duckworth969 Jan 2026 #23
That is exactly what I think as well, that is why I would rather see an investigation by Bev54 Jan 2026 #26
Oh, Newsweek. Using "to obtain." Not using: to annex, to invade, to plunder, to beseige. nilram Jan 2026 #17
Using "to obtain" instead of "State-sponsored terrorism" Justice matters. Jan 2026 #19
What a pointless exercise in futility swong19104 Jan 2026 #21
HE DOES NOT CARE! James48 Jan 2026 #22
Remember to contact your reps BoycottTwitter Jan 2026 #24
YES!!! Now if only enough repubs will vote for the resolution.. Amaryllis Jan 2026 #25
CALL republicans, leave messages, email them etc etc vapor2 Jan 2026 #28
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Funding to Be Blocked For...