Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Smithsonian removes Trump impeachment text as it swaps his portrait [View all]William Seger
(12,246 posts)4. And yes, #rump had replaced the "woke" Director of the National Portrait Gallery
Trumps assault on the Smithsonian: The goal is to reframe the entire culture of the US
The president has vowed to kill off woke in his second term in office, and the venerable cultural institution a few blocks from the White House is in his sights
It seemed like an ordinary Friday. Until, that is, an anxious colleague came in to tell Sajet that the president of the United States had personally denounced her on social media. Upon the request and recommendation of many people I am herby [sic] terminating the employment of Kim Sajet as Director of the National Portrait Gallery, Donald Trump had posted on Truth Social. According to the post, Sajet was a highly partisan person and a strong supporter of diversity and inclusion programmes, which by an executive order on his inauguration day, 20 January, he had eradicated from federal agencies. Her replacement will be named shortly, continued the message. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
...
Sajet kept off social media, avoiding the threatening messages from Trumps base that friends told her were amassing. She lasted until Thursday 12 June. In the end, she decided she should try to defuse what she feared could turn into a larger, more resolute attack on the museum. It just became fairly obvious that the story wasnt going to change, she told me. So I thought, Im just going to take control of this, and step outside of the maelstrom.
In short, the president had ended up getting what he wanted without a jot of authority to do so. As for Sajets supposed partisan position, her adherence to the loathed ideology of diversity and inclusion? Sajets mission had been, she told me, to ensure that Americans would be able to see portraits of people like themselves. Gradually, she made sure more women, more minorities, more Black people were represented on its walls. It was just recognising that people had been knocked out of the national story, so lets put them back in, she said. It wasnt terribly revolutionary.
The president has vowed to kill off woke in his second term in office, and the venerable cultural institution a few blocks from the White House is in his sights
It seemed like an ordinary Friday. Until, that is, an anxious colleague came in to tell Sajet that the president of the United States had personally denounced her on social media. Upon the request and recommendation of many people I am herby [sic] terminating the employment of Kim Sajet as Director of the National Portrait Gallery, Donald Trump had posted on Truth Social. According to the post, Sajet was a highly partisan person and a strong supporter of diversity and inclusion programmes, which by an executive order on his inauguration day, 20 January, he had eradicated from federal agencies. Her replacement will be named shortly, continued the message. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
...
Sajet kept off social media, avoiding the threatening messages from Trumps base that friends told her were amassing. She lasted until Thursday 12 June. In the end, she decided she should try to defuse what she feared could turn into a larger, more resolute attack on the museum. It just became fairly obvious that the story wasnt going to change, she told me. So I thought, Im just going to take control of this, and step outside of the maelstrom.
In short, the president had ended up getting what he wanted without a jot of authority to do so. As for Sajets supposed partisan position, her adherence to the loathed ideology of diversity and inclusion? Sajets mission had been, she told me, to ensure that Americans would be able to see portraits of people like themselves. Gradually, she made sure more women, more minorities, more Black people were represented on its walls. It was just recognising that people had been knocked out of the national story, so lets put them back in, she said. It wasnt terribly revolutionary.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/08/donald-trump-smithsonian-reframe-entire-culture-united-states
EDITED to add the end of the story: #rump didn't successfully fire her, since he didn't have the authority, but he and his cult of turd worshipers harassed her into resigning.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
23 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Smithsonian removes Trump impeachment text as it swaps his portrait [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Jan 10
OP
Shame on you Smithsonian, I will never cross into your history hiding doors again...disgusting...
wcmagumba
Jan 10
#1
And yes, #rump had replaced the "woke" Director of the National Portrait Gallery
William Seger
Jan 10
#4
I am going to re-visit my membership with the Air and Space Museum, which is tied to the Smithsonian
turbinetree
Jan 10
#12
That is what I was going to speak about with them, there are thousands of us that support the institution
turbinetree
Jan 13
#22
"The notion that history should have any pretenses of impartiality at all was jettisoned as a 'liberal fallacy'."
LudwigPastorius
Jan 10
#14