Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Hugin

(38,019 posts)

11. A few hundred years...

Reply to hunter (Reply #10)

Mon Feb 16, 2026, 01:07 PM

Feb 2026

The US is only barely making 250 years and the seams are splitting. Contracts only last an average of three years. Who’s going to pay to watch over and maintain these reactors for a few hundred years?

If only one of them falls into the wrong hands during that time, a few hundred years. I guess it’s our great grandchildren who will find out.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US conducts first air transport of nuclear microreactor in bid to show technology's viability [View all] BumRushDaShow Feb 2026 OP

It says a C-17 was used. I am curious if other planes-maybe the military also flew along side riversedge Feb 2026 #1

It says in the OP "without nuclear fuel" muriel_volestrangler Feb 2026 #4

Thanks. I did not read carefully -- riversedge Feb 2026 #5

From the first paragraph: discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2026 #6

"I do not have access to the article. Sorry." - Sometimes I can find the msn repost of Reuters articles at post time BumRushDaShow Feb 2026 #9

What could go wrong? orangecrush Feb 2026 #2

There is no business case for microreactors, --- Yes there is.. LiberalArkie Feb 2026 #3

Good idea if someone could show facts as to it being cheaper energy Bengus81 Feb 2026 #16

There is one other very strong use case.... reACTIONary Feb 2026 #17

Looks like the AI bros want to make a wasteland of scattered RTGs and ADRs like the Soviets did. Hugin Feb 2026 #7

This is not a radioisotope thermoelectric generator. hunter Feb 2026 #10

A few hundred years... Hugin Feb 2026 #11

Any of our great grandchildren who survive will be cursing us for our addiction to fossil fuels. hunter Feb 2026 #13

I am not tremendously confident in this administration to test the viability of this energy solution... EarthFirst Feb 2026 #8

Dear leader has been reading comics again and wants a nuclear air force pecosbob Feb 2026 #12

Bell Laboratories demonstrated the first practical photovoltaic cell in 1954. hunter Feb 2026 #14

The cost of the nuclear waste is billions DougBee Feb 2026 #15

Places with aggressive renewable energy programs have the most expensive electricity. hunter Feb 2026 #19

Every one of our nuclear submarines .... reACTIONary Feb 2026 #18

These "meltdown proof" little reactors are cool, but... LudwigPastorius Feb 2026 #20