Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(10,897 posts)

21. They have to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt

Fri Mar 6, 2026, 01:33 PM

Friday

With all the evidence on Jan 6th, that is close to impossible.
Her testimony alone was very believable

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wasn't she pardon?................. Lovie777 Friday #1

I thought she might have been but wasn't BumRushDaShow Friday #2

Maybe she was given immunity? 2naSalit Friday #3

I don't think she was BumRushDaShow Friday #4

As I recall, she had notes and referred to them in a deposition Raven123 Friday #5

Yes Deminpenn Friday #9

Yes he was. RVN VET71 Friday #14

Those people are a pile of shit. Biophilic Friday #7

Go for it Loudermilk liberalgunwilltravel Friday #8

They better watch their step with her! HeartsCanHope Friday #10

Cassidy Hutchinson is considered a whistleblower Emile Friday #11

I wondered what the next case the DOJ was going to lose would be -misanthroptimist Friday #12

One more failure to indict by a Grand Jury. Vinca Friday #13

Please, Stephen, your next guest. RVN VET71 Friday #15

Lying to congress? MoseShrute Friday #16

So she is being punished for telling the truth? Multichromatic Friday #17

Just swat away those pesky gnats and move on. oasis Friday #18

Discovery will be awesome angrychair Friday #19

They have to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt Jarqui Friday #21

Oh no! ShazzieB Saturday #22