Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JT45242

(4,043 posts)
11. I doubt Obergefell makes it through next year's docket
Tue Mar 31, 2026, 12:23 PM
12 hrs ago

It is on the Project 2025 list.

It is a chance to make another scapegoat -- one that Nazis -- historical and current will be happy to send to death camps.

This is a sad day for our country and the rule of law.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Obergefell is in danger Prairie Gates 14 hrs ago #1
I doubt Obergefell makes it through next year's docket JT45242 12 hrs ago #11
I don't know that there's a live case coming through the courts that would challenge Obergefell Prairie Gates 12 hrs ago #15
Not any time soon FBaggins 9 hrs ago #29
There were actually two reasons for my timeframe in my post Prairie Gates 8 hrs ago #30
Conversion therapy is torture LetMyPeopleVote 14 hrs ago #2
I could accept this, though not like it, if this principle were being applied anything like equally dsc 14 hrs ago #3
Yikes! Kagan and Sotomayor concurring with the conservatives Jose Garcia 13 hrs ago #4
This is an excerpt from the Kagan & Sotomayor concurring opinion. Justice Kagan authored it & Justice Sotomayor joined. 24601 13 hrs ago #6
Disappointing. Conversion therapy is harmful quackery. SunSeeker 12 hrs ago #9
They actually cover that in the opinion Shrek 12 hrs ago #12
Yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theater is "only speech" as well, but it is regulated. SunSeeker 11 hrs ago #16
Sure, but yelling in a crowded theatre isn't speech based on viewpoint Shrek 10 hrs ago #23
Or they just voted for what they thought was right Polybius 10 hrs ago #24
The weird christo-fascist sleep-away camps wolfie001 13 hrs ago #5
They charge a lot of money for those camps. dickthegrouch 11 hrs ago #19
No protections from mental abuse by religious fanatics. maxsolomon 12 hrs ago #7
"We condone child abuse," says Supreme Court sakabatou 12 hrs ago #8
WTF? It is not a Free Speech question. It is a medical, sociological, and ethical question. Martin68 12 hrs ago #10
Apparently that's how it works, according to the opinion Shrek 12 hrs ago #14
That is impossible angrychair 11 hrs ago #20
If that is what the decision is based on, then it does seem reasonable to me. As long as advice is freely requested and Martin68 11 hrs ago #22
Many of the people undergoing conversion therapy are minors forced by their bigoted Christian parents. Lonestarblue 9 hrs ago #26
I agree entirely. My point is if the subject request advice, that is legit. Does the court finding allow parents to Martin68 3 hrs ago #31
Abuse because of a child's gender identity or sexual orientation certainly isn't a domain exclusive to Christianity. 24601 1 hr ago #32
The court opened the door to any and all quack Klarkashton 12 hrs ago #13
Sweet, I'll set up shop tomorrow angrychair 11 hrs ago #17
So it'll be okay for us to develop a conversion therapy program... WestMichRad 11 hrs ago #18
MAGAt conversion therapy. AWESOME! Dr. T 9 hrs ago #25
Lots of other instances where the government is restricting speech. dickthegrouch 11 hrs ago #21
Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court sides with Christian counselor over Colorado on 'conversion therapy' for minors LetMyPeopleVote 9 hrs ago #27
Deadline Legal Blog-Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson steps out alone, again - this time on 'conversion therapy' LetMyPeopleVote 9 hrs ago #28
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court rules again...»Reply #11