Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Martin68

(27,749 posts)
31. I agree entirely. My point is if the subject request advice, that is legit. Does the court finding allow parents to
Tue Mar 31, 2026, 09:20 PM
Tuesday

force their children into therapy?

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Obergefell is in danger Prairie Gates Tuesday #1
I doubt Obergefell makes it through next year's docket JT45242 Tuesday #11
I don't know that there's a live case coming through the courts that would challenge Obergefell Prairie Gates Tuesday #15
Not any time soon FBaggins Tuesday #29
There were actually two reasons for my timeframe in my post Prairie Gates Tuesday #30
Conversion therapy is torture LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #2
I could accept this, though not like it, if this principle were being applied anything like equally dsc Tuesday #3
Yikes! Kagan and Sotomayor concurring with the conservatives Jose Garcia Tuesday #4
This is an excerpt from the Kagan & Sotomayor concurring opinion. Justice Kagan authored it & Justice Sotomayor joined. 24601 Tuesday #6
Disappointing. Conversion therapy is harmful quackery. SunSeeker Tuesday #9
They actually cover that in the opinion Shrek Tuesday #12
Yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theater is "only speech" as well, but it is regulated. SunSeeker Tuesday #16
Sure, but yelling in a crowded theatre isn't speech based on viewpoint Shrek Tuesday #23
Asserting there is a fire is definitely a viewpoint. SunSeeker Yesterday #34
Or they just voted for what they thought was right Polybius Tuesday #24
The weird christo-fascist sleep-away camps wolfie001 Tuesday #5
They charge a lot of money for those camps. dickthegrouch Tuesday #19
No protections from mental abuse by religious fanatics. maxsolomon Tuesday #7
"We condone child abuse," says Supreme Court sakabatou Tuesday #8
WTF? It is not a Free Speech question. It is a medical, sociological, and ethical question. Martin68 Tuesday #10
Apparently that's how it works, according to the opinion Shrek Tuesday #14
That is impossible angrychair Tuesday #20
If that is what the decision is based on, then it does seem reasonable to me. As long as advice is freely requested and Martin68 Tuesday #22
Many of the people undergoing conversion therapy are minors forced by their bigoted Christian parents. Lonestarblue Tuesday #26
I agree entirely. My point is if the subject request advice, that is legit. Does the court finding allow parents to Martin68 Tuesday #31
Abuse because of a child's gender identity or sexual orientation certainly isn't a domain exclusive to Christianity. 24601 Tuesday #32
The court opened the door to any and all quack Klarkashton Tuesday #13
Sweet, I'll set up shop tomorrow angrychair Tuesday #17
So it'll be okay for us to develop a conversion therapy program... WestMichRad Tuesday #18
MAGAt conversion therapy. AWESOME! Dr. T Tuesday #25
Lots of other instances where the government is restricting speech. dickthegrouch Tuesday #21
Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court sides with Christian counselor over Colorado on 'conversion therapy' for minors LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #27
Deadline Legal Blog-Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson steps out alone, again - this time on 'conversion therapy' LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #28
If you would, expand a bit on the risks Shrek 21 hrs ago #35
Desperation. The clock is ticking. The Grand Illuminist Yesterday #33
Conversion Exploitation. Nothing therapy about it. Scott Alan Swaggerty 19 hrs ago #36
Arguments in favor of 'conversion therapy' may be free speech, but the 'therapy' itself is not. Aristus 17 hrs ago #37
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court rules again...»Reply #31