Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Tennessee man jailed over Charlie Kirk post wins $835,000 settlement [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(182,421 posts)33. MS NOW Opinion-A post after Charlie Kirk's death never should have landed our client in jail
Larry Bushart sued the government after spending 37 days jailed for posting a meme following Charlie Kirks assassination. He has now won an $835,000 settlement.
Link to tweet
https://www.ms.now/opinion/charlie-kirk-meme-first-amendment-free-speech
Case in point: On the night of Sept. 21, 2025, police officers in Lexington, Tennessee, executed a warrant obtained at the direction of Perry County Sheriff Nick Weems, handcuffed Larry Bushart and drove him to jail in Lexington. He was later transferred to a jail in Perry County, where he remained for 37 days on a $2 million bond. His alleged crime? Posting a political meme.
Bushart participated in a Facebook discussion following Charlie Kirks assassination. He posted a meme quoting Donald Trumps comment from the day after a 2024 shooting at Perry High School in Iowa: We have to get over it.
The sheriff and his investigator knew at the time of Busharts arrest that the meme referenced a 2024 shooting in Iowa. But that didnt stop them from arguing that Bushart was threatening, a year later, to shoot up Perry County High School in Perry County, Tennessee. Nor did it matter that the meme simply isnt a threat on its face and cant reasonably be read as one.
After the sheriff admitted that he knew all along that Bushart wasnt threatening the local school, the district attorneys office dropped the criminal charge and released Bushart from jail on Oct. 29, 2025.
With the help of our organization, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, Bushart sued to vindicate his First Amendment rights. This week, FIRE announced a settlement under which Bushart will receive $835,000 in exchange for dismissing his complaint.
The First Amendment presumptively protects all speech, carving out a few limited, narrow categories of unprotected speech. True threats serious expressions of an intent to commit unlawful violence are unprotected. But the Supreme Court has long held that political hyperbole is not an unprotected true threat. ....
Free speech and heated political rhetoric in particular is essential to a free society. For one, majority rule in a democracy is only legitimate if minority voices have been able to make their case. For another, free flowing political speech acts as a check against consolidated political power. And free speech acts as a safety valve for dissent, offering a crucial alternative to violence.
Alarmingly, a December 2025 FIRE survey found that 9 out of 10 undergraduates believe that words can be violence and this was after the Charlie Kirk assassination, an extreme and tragic example of the sharp difference between words and violence. When officials bring meritless prosecutions against the Larry Busharts and James Comeys of the world, they risk blurring that line even further.
Busharts meme and Comeys seashells are not threats of violence not even close. By pretending otherwise, government officials in both cases betrayed fundamental First Amendment law and free speech values. From a historical perspective, this is not surprising, but it is disappointing. Law enforcement must do better, and Americans must hold them accountable when they fail to respect the Constitution.
Bushart participated in a Facebook discussion following Charlie Kirks assassination. He posted a meme quoting Donald Trumps comment from the day after a 2024 shooting at Perry High School in Iowa: We have to get over it.
The sheriff and his investigator knew at the time of Busharts arrest that the meme referenced a 2024 shooting in Iowa. But that didnt stop them from arguing that Bushart was threatening, a year later, to shoot up Perry County High School in Perry County, Tennessee. Nor did it matter that the meme simply isnt a threat on its face and cant reasonably be read as one.
After the sheriff admitted that he knew all along that Bushart wasnt threatening the local school, the district attorneys office dropped the criminal charge and released Bushart from jail on Oct. 29, 2025.
With the help of our organization, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, Bushart sued to vindicate his First Amendment rights. This week, FIRE announced a settlement under which Bushart will receive $835,000 in exchange for dismissing his complaint.
The First Amendment presumptively protects all speech, carving out a few limited, narrow categories of unprotected speech. True threats serious expressions of an intent to commit unlawful violence are unprotected. But the Supreme Court has long held that political hyperbole is not an unprotected true threat. ....
Free speech and heated political rhetoric in particular is essential to a free society. For one, majority rule in a democracy is only legitimate if minority voices have been able to make their case. For another, free flowing political speech acts as a check against consolidated political power. And free speech acts as a safety valve for dissent, offering a crucial alternative to violence.
Alarmingly, a December 2025 FIRE survey found that 9 out of 10 undergraduates believe that words can be violence and this was after the Charlie Kirk assassination, an extreme and tragic example of the sharp difference between words and violence. When officials bring meritless prosecutions against the Larry Busharts and James Comeys of the world, they risk blurring that line even further.
Busharts meme and Comeys seashells are not threats of violence not even close. By pretending otherwise, government officials in both cases betrayed fundamental First Amendment law and free speech values. From a historical perspective, this is not surprising, but it is disappointing. Law enforcement must do better, and Americans must hold them accountable when they fail to respect the Constitution.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Tennessee man jailed over Charlie Kirk post wins $835,000 settlement [View all]
Omaha Steve
Wednesday
OP
Well, we can't expect the legislators in Tennessee to know anything about the constitution.
Walleye
Wednesday
#4
So, his 'crime' was posting a meme on FB that held a mirror up to Trump telling us to 'get over' school shootings?
Attilatheblond
Wednesday
#5
Why go through all the hustles to file claims: They would never get a penny.
Justice matters.
Wednesday
#19
It ain't the "Tennessee officials" who will pay the $835,000". It is the Tennessee taxpayers.
erronis
Wednesday
#20
Agree, and the buttholes responsible -- all of them -- should be jailed for at least 37 days. At least!
RVN VET71
Thursday
#30
Deadline Legal Blog-Man jailed 37 days for Charlie Kirk social media post wins $835,000 settlement
LetMyPeopleVote
Sunday
#32
MS NOW Opinion-A post after Charlie Kirk's death never should have landed our client in jail
LetMyPeopleVote
9 hrs ago
#33