Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(173,902 posts)
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 10:37 AM Tuesday

Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, blocks Trump order [View all]

Source: CNBC

Published Tue, Jun 30 2026 10:35 AM EDT Updated 2 Min Ago


The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the right to citizenship for people born in the United States, rejecting an executive order by President Donald Trump that sought to undo that longstanding constitutional principle for children born to many immigrants.

“Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause,” the majority decision written by Chief Justice John Roberts said.

Roberts was joined by his fellow conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, along with the court’s three liberal justices, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, in the majority ruling on 14th Amendment grounds.

Another conservative, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, wrote that he did not believe Trump’s executive order violated the 14th Amendment, but that it “does contravene a federal statute” adopted in 1940 that addresses the citizenship of people born in the U.S. The court’s justices had signaled during oral arguments in April that they would affirm that individuals born in the United States to non-U.S. citizens are automatically granted citizenship.

Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/30/supreme-court-birthright-citizenship-ruling.html



Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-365_4hdj.pdf


Article updated.

Previous article -

Published Tue, Jun 30 2026 10:35 AM EDT Updated 1 Min Ago


The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the right to citizenship for people born in the United States, rejecting an executive order by President Donald Trump that sought to undo that longstanding constitutional principle for children born to many immigrants.

The court's justices had signaled during oral arguments in April that they would affirm that individuals born in the United States to non-U.S. citizens are automatically granted citizenship. Trump attended the oral arguments for the case, the first sitting president ever to do so. The case is known as Trump v. Barbara.

The citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which was adopted in 1868, says,"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Trump, on his first day back in the White House on Jan. 20, 2025, signed an executive order seeking to undo that right. The order said that 30 days after its effective date, babies born in the U.S. were not entitled to be issued citizenship documents if their parents had immigrated illegally or were undocumented workers.



Original article -

Published Tue, Jun 30 2026 10:35 AM EDT


This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, striking down Trump's order LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #1
It would have been a huge surprise if it was unanimous. onenote Tuesday #3
Strange, isn't it..... SergeStorms Tuesday #33
Should have been 9-0 Deminpenn Tuesday #5
Not surprised that it wasn't 9-0 Old Crank Tuesday #6
I didn't see how divided it was... could you tell me? I'm headed out the door on errands... thanks! slightlv Tuesday #8
6-3 decision LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #11
Five to Three.... reACTIONary Tuesday #2
5-3 SMDH slightlv Tuesday #9
Yes, 5 to 3 is disappointing, maybe... reACTIONary Tuesday #12
It would have been a surprise if it were a unanimous decision. J_William_Ryan Tuesday #4
I can't believe I'm saying this but I give Thomas a little credit in his dissent jgmiller Tuesday #7
I see what you are saying... reACTIONary Tuesday #14
The debate point seemed to be focused on the term "domicile" BumRushDaShow Tuesday #18
I was thinking they would tweak the visitor LeftInTX Tuesday #29
I'm upset that I . . . AverageOldGuy Tuesday #10
So does this mean alito is no longer an "originalist?" MoseShrute Tuesday #13
"Originalist" and "Textualist" are basically scams.... reACTIONary Tuesday #16
it means he's a racist liar (also a misogynist and theofascist) LymphocyteLover Tuesday #21
It only applies when you agree with what it says! Callie1979 Tuesday #30
I'm actually surprised. Gaytano70 Tuesday #15
I would have liked 9 to 0... reACTIONary Tuesday #17
Same. YodaMom2 Tuesday #25
From Robert's opinion Danmel Tuesday #19
Super important point-- this issue isn't going away for the rightwing. We HAVE to fix the court. LymphocyteLover Tuesday #20
But Roe was never an Amendment. Callie1979 Tuesday #32
Yeah, but the point is they have their teeth in this one and are unlikely to let go LymphocyteLover Tuesday #42
The court got this one right. republianmushroom Tuesday #22
It was 5/4 Dangling0826 Tuesday #23
What?!??!! The thugs and hacks on the Supreme Court actually READ the Constitution? NNadir Tuesday #24
Judge Thomas DonCoquixote Tuesday #26
He got his... Kablooie Tuesday #36
The law isn't important to Trump. What is important to him is his racist signaling to his adoring base, and he has Doodley Tuesday #27
Relieved, but thought it would 7-2 LeftInTX Tuesday #28
Yay! But... what's next? WestMichRad Tuesday #31
I support our next Democratic president throwing spaghetti at the wall with outlandish overreach too! ffr Tuesday #34
Three of them.., Kablooie Tuesday #35
Marco Rubio and JD Vance are going to be crushed. Aristus Tuesday #37
It's scary how close this was fujiyamasan Tuesday #38
even roberts can't undo a fucking amendment. big fucking DUH! pansypoo53219 Tuesday #39
I love how liberals are accused of legislating from the bench lakercub Tuesday #40
One less thing to worry about for now. mtngirl47 Tuesday #41
Good. Thankful. Plenty of MAGAts were looking to throw me out IronLionZion Tuesday #43
Legal experts sound alarm after razor-thin birthright vote: 'The most insane part' LetMyPeopleVote Wednesday #44
This ruling should have been 9-0 LetMyPeopleVote Wednesday #45
Impeachments sedwin Wednesday #46
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court upholds bir...