Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(173,834 posts)

18. The debate point seemed to be focused on the term "domicile"

Reply to jgmiller (Reply #7)

Tue Jun 30, 2026, 11:32 AM

Yesterday

and what that may have meant in the 1800s vs today.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

LeftInTX

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, blocks Trump order [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP

Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, striking down Trump's order LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #1

It would have been a huge surprise if it was unanimous. onenote Yesterday #3

Strange, isn't it..... SergeStorms Yesterday #33

Should have been 9-0 Deminpenn Yesterday #5

Not surprised that it wasn't 9-0 Old Crank Yesterday #6

I didn't see how divided it was... could you tell me? I'm headed out the door on errands... thanks! slightlv Yesterday #8

6-3 decision LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #11

Five to Three.... reACTIONary Yesterday #2

5-3 SMDH slightlv Yesterday #9

Yes, 5 to 3 is disappointing, maybe... reACTIONary Yesterday #12

It would have been a surprise if it were a unanimous decision. J_William_Ryan Yesterday #4

I can't believe I'm saying this but I give Thomas a little credit in his dissent jgmiller Yesterday #7

I see what you are saying... reACTIONary Yesterday #14

The debate point seemed to be focused on the term "domicile" BumRushDaShow Yesterday #18

I was thinking they would tweak the visitor LeftInTX Yesterday #29

I'm upset that I . . . AverageOldGuy Yesterday #10

So does this mean alito is no longer an "originalist?" MoseShrute Yesterday #13

"Originalist" and "Textualist" are basically scams.... reACTIONary Yesterday #16

it means he's a racist liar (also a misogynist and theofascist) LymphocyteLover Yesterday #21

It only applies when you agree with what it says! Callie1979 Yesterday #30

I'm actually surprised. Gaytano70 Yesterday #15

I would have liked 9 to 0... reACTIONary Yesterday #17

Same. YodaMom2 Yesterday #25

From Robert's opinion Danmel Yesterday #19

Super important point-- this issue isn't going away for the rightwing. We HAVE to fix the court. LymphocyteLover Yesterday #20

But Roe was never an Amendment. Callie1979 Yesterday #32

Yeah, but the point is they have their teeth in this one and are unlikely to let go LymphocyteLover 22 hrs ago #42

The court got this one right. republianmushroom Yesterday #22

It was 5/4 Dangling0826 Yesterday #23

What?!??!! The thugs and hacks on the Supreme Court actually READ the Constitution? NNadir Yesterday #24

Judge Thomas DonCoquixote Yesterday #26

He got his... Kablooie Yesterday #36

The law isn't important to Trump. What is important to him is his racist signaling to his adoring base, and he has Doodley Yesterday #27

Relieved, but thought it would 7-2 LeftInTX Yesterday #28

Yay! But... what's next? WestMichRad Yesterday #31

I support our next Democratic president throwing spaghetti at the wall with outlandish overreach too! ffr Yesterday #34

Three of them.., Kablooie Yesterday #35

Marco Rubio and JD Vance are going to be crushed. Aristus Yesterday #37

It's scary how close this was fujiyamasan Yesterday #38

even roberts can't undo a fucking amendment. big fucking DUH! pansypoo53219 Yesterday #39

I love how liberals are accused of legislating from the bench lakercub Yesterday #40

One less thing to worry about for now. mtngirl47 23 hrs ago #41

Good. Thankful. Plenty of MAGAts were looking to throw me out IronLionZion 20 hrs ago #43

Legal experts sound alarm after razor-thin birthright vote: 'The most insane part' LetMyPeopleVote 4 hrs ago #44

This ruling should have been 9-0 LetMyPeopleVote 3 hrs ago #45

Impeachments sedwin 3 hrs ago #46