Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

OldBaldy1701E

(11,905 posts)

1. Ahh, yes. That specific word that explains the specific issues that the law is addressing.

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Jul 7, 2026, 08:06 AM

Tuesday

'Harmful'.

A word whose definition shifts like the sands of time whenever some self-righteous know nothing decides that they should force others to believe the same stupid shit that they do, and have decided that anything that they don't like has to be 'harmful'.

You know... things like reading books other than the Bible, allowing women and minorities to be treated like normal human beings, worshiping anything other than the almighty dollar (which they hide by connecting their greed to their church), things like that.

Basically, 'harmful' translates into 'things that we don't like'.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

oberle JustKay

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court lets Texas restrict minors' access to app stores for the time being [View all] BumRushDaShow Tuesday OP

Ahh, yes. That specific word that explains the specific issues that the law is addressing. OldBaldy1701E Tuesday #1

Texas' argument to the court was smart jgmiller Tuesday #2