Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pinback

(13,013 posts)
8. "Veep home-state advantage" is a vestige of the distant past, say political scientists who wrote a book on the subject
Mon Aug 5, 2024, 07:52 AM
Aug 2024

The post at the link below excerpts a recent New York Magazine article citing the work of two political scientists who’ve thoroughly researched the subject:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219284836

“While presidential candidates typically enjoy a home-state advantage (approximately 3 points to 7 points), vice presidential candidates generally do not. … [A] presidential ticket performs no better in the vice presidential candidate’s home state than we would expect otherwise. Statistically speaking, the effect is zero.

We did find that veep home-state voters are more likely to care who wins an election compared with non-home state voters—but they aren’t more likely to turn out to vote, volunteer for or donate money to a campaign, influence other voters or attend political rallies."

Shapiro on the ticket isn't necessary to carry PA, either. Either Shapiro or Walz would be effective campaigners in their respective home states. Walz does seem to have a rare ability to connect with rural, moderate, and swing voters, as well as young and progressive voters.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Shapiro Helps In At Least...»Reply #8