Editorials & Other Articles

underpants

(187,361 posts)

5. Does she think trans people have been able to be open en masse for less than the last 10 years?

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Thu Dec 5, 2024, 05:31 PM

Dec 5

Attorney Chase Strangio, the first transgender lawyer to argue in front of the Supreme Court, also later addressed Coney Barrett’s tone-deaf question.

“Transgender people are characterized as having a different gender identity than their birth sex. That is distinguishing,” Strangio said. “I would also point, if I could, to the history of discrimination—and there are many examples—of in-law discrimination, exclusions from the military, criminal bans on cross-dressing, and others.”

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Amy Coney Barrett's Mind-Boggling Question in Supreme Court Trans Case [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 5 OP

She is either lying or totally clueless. Irish_Dem Dec 5 #1

She will never see what she does not want to see and deal with Attilatheblond Dec 5 #2

I think she has a point -- though probably not her intention -- it is only recently under MAGA for laws discriminating Silent Type Dec 5 #3

Here's a few things that would indicate a past federal discrimination against transgenders. sinkingfeeling Dec 5 #4

Does she think trans people have been able to be open en masse for less than the last 10 years? underpants Dec 5 #5

Those... 2naSalit Dec 5 #6

Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 5 #7

"No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot"..Mark Twain Deuxcents Dec 5 #8