Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(116,374 posts)
Fri Dec 20, 2024, 03:23 PM Friday

Behold 'the obsequious instruments of his pleasure' [View all]

By Sid Schwab / Herald Columnist

Today’s lesson is from the Federalist Papers. Open your textbooks to The Federalist No. 76 (National Archive: tinyurl.com/4fed76). Quilled by the recently resurrected Alexander Hamilton, it includes the following:

“It will readily be comprehended, that a man who had himself the sole disposition of offices, would be governed much more by his private inclinations and interests, than when he was bound to submit the propriety of his choice to the discussion and determination of a different and independent body, and that body an entire branch of the legislature. … He would be both ashamed and afraid to bring forward, for the most distinguished or lucrative stations, candidates who had no other merit than … being in some way or other personally allied to him, or of possessing the necessary insignificance and pliancy to render them the obsequious instruments of his pleasure. …”

That, in a florid nutshell, is the rationale for requiring the Senate to investigate, then approve or deny a president’s choices for positions of power. Mr. Hamilton must have had exactly the narcissistic, vengeful, self-promoting Trump in mind. (Wrongly, he presumed a human capability of shame.) Not alone among his colleagues, idiocratic Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., believes Trump should be allowed anyone he chooses, without pesky, Constitution-mandated interference (HuffPost: tinyurl.com/badcoach4u).

Aware of human imperfections, the Founders almost had it right. But they seem to have assumed that, in aggregate, senators would not suffer the infirmities we see in Trump. That, tasked with evaluating obviously unqualified and dangerous nominees, senators would place duty to protect and defend the Constitution above all else. In their defense, Our Fathers were surrounded by and were themselves men of good intention, having risked much to create a new nation. If they foresaw a sociopathic individual like Trump as president, they could not have imagined a Senate majority of them.

https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/schwab-behold-the-obsequious-instruments-of-his-pleasure/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Let's Face It Square; the Worst of the Founders (and There Were Some Dismal Ones for Sure) Were Far Better The Roux Comes First Friday #1
I wonder... slightlv Friday #2
Point Well Taken! The Roux Comes First 14 hrs ago #4
spot on Skittles Yesterday #3
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Behold 'the obsequious in...